These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21299334)

  • 1. Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 21299334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-switch costs subsequent to cue-only trials.
    Swainson R; Martin D; Prosser L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1453-1470. PubMed ID: 27174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Updating sensory versus task representations during task-switching: insights from cognitive brain potentials in humans.
    Periáñez JA; Barceló F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1160-72. PubMed ID: 19350711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Switching between visuomotor mappings: learning absolute mappings or relative shifts.
    van Dam LC; Hawellek DJ; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23447680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue-task associations in task switching.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 17514592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.
    Jost K; Mayr U; Rösler F
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 8(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18405048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval.
    Kleinsorge T
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 21617987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control processes in voluntary and explicitly cued task switching.
    Masson ME; Carruthers S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1944-58. PubMed ID: 24443883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential effects of aging on processes underlying task switching.
    West R; Travers S
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 18403080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.