These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21299376)

  • 1. Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves.
    Sęk A; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 21299376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Innovation through electronic media.
    Roeser RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):210. PubMed ID: 21375369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 11527034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of two tests for measuring sensitivity to temporal fine structure.
    Sęk A; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jan; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 22050366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
    Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalizing noise test in dead region identification.
    Warnaar B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22429189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: a comparison of simultaneous and forward masking.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):463-76. PubMed ID: 17005489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical feasibility of fast psychophysical tuning curves evaluated using normally hearing adults: success rate, range of tip shift, repeatability, and comparison of methods used for estimation of frequency at the tip.
    Myers J; Malicka AN
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):887-94. PubMed ID: 25156231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Huss M; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):205-24. PubMed ID: 10997450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosing cochlear dead regions in children.
    Malicka AN; Munro KJ; Baker RJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 19935424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):115-31. PubMed ID: 15668043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Moore BCJ; Glasberg B; Schlueter A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():43-50. PubMed ID: 19955720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves.
    Sek A; Alcántara J; Moore BC; Kluk K; Wicher A
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jul; 44(7):408-20. PubMed ID: 16136791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):118-34. PubMed ID: 15276683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporary off-frequency listening after noise trauma.
    Etchelecou MC; Coulet O; Derkenne R; Tomasi M; Noreña AJ
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):81-91. PubMed ID: 21986211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase-dependent audiometry with low-frequency masking revisited.
    Rahne T; Rasinski C; Neumann K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 188(2):302-4. PubMed ID: 20171987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Charaziak KK; Souza PE; Siegel JH
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 25290042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods.
    Moore BCJ; Wan J; Varathanathan A; Naddell S; Baer T
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519841980. PubMed ID: 31081487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-efficient measures of auditory frequency selectivity.
    Charaziak KK; Souza P; Siegel JH
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 22107443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.