These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21299604)

  • 21. Do differentials in the support and advice available at UK schools and colleges influence candidate performance in the medical school admissions interview? A survey of direct school leaver applicants to a UK medical school.
    Lambe P; Waters C; Bristow D
    Med Teach; 2013 Sep; 35(9):731-9. PubMed ID: 23795943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The selection process in the Faculty of Medicine: the usefulness of a psychological and aptitude assessment].
    Lia C; Cavaggioni G
    Clin Ter; 2013; 164(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 23455742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Core personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process?
    Koenig TW; Parrish SK; Terregino CA; Williams JP; Dunleavy DM; Volsch JM
    Acad Med; 2013 May; 88(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 23524928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Admission as a dental student to the former UMDS and its relationship to socio-demographic characteristics.
    Newton JT; Buck D; Thorogood N; Skelly AM
    Br Dent J; 2003 Aug; 195(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 12970704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selection of medical students according to their moral orientation.
    Bore M; Munro D; Kerridge I; Powis D
    Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 15733162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On selection of medical students: a personal response.
    Warren JD
    Intern Med J; 2006 May; 36(5):334. PubMed ID: 16650204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Even one star at A level could be "too little, too late" for medical student selection.
    McManus C; Woolf K; Dacre JE
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 8():16. PubMed ID: 18394196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perspective: Medical school admissions and noncognitive testing: some open questions.
    Bardes CL; Best PC; Kremer SJ; Dienstag JL
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10):1360-3. PubMed ID: 19881422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school.
    Lumsden MA; Bore M; Millar K; Jack R; Powis D
    Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 15733161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How leaky is the health career pipeline? Minority student achievement in college gateway courses.
    Alexander C; Chen E; Grumbach K
    Acad Med; 2009 Jun; 84(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 19474563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Admission tests for medical education].
    O'Neill LD; Wallstedt B; Hartvigsen J; Eika B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Feb; 174(9):560-2. PubMed ID: 22369903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assuring the integrity of medical school admission decisions.
    Kanter SL
    Acad Med; 2008 Jul; 83(7):623-4. PubMed ID: 18580074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability estimates: behavioural stations and questionnaires in medical school admissions.
    Gafni N; Moshinsky A; Eisenberg O; Zeigler D; Ziv A
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):277-88. PubMed ID: 22324527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A perspective on medical school admission research and practice over the last 25 years.
    Kreiter CD; Axelson RD
    Teach Learn Med; 2013; 25 Suppl 1():S50-6. PubMed ID: 24246107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical school admissions: enhancing the reliability and validity of an autobiographical screening tool.
    Dore KL; Hanson M; Reiter HI; Blanchard M; Deeth K; Eva KW
    Acad Med; 2006 Oct; 81(10 Suppl):S70-3. PubMed ID: 17001140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: what has changed since the 1980s?
    Monroe A; Quinn E; Samuelson W; Dunleavy DM; Dowd KW
    Acad Med; 2013 May; 88(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 23524917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How to select the doctors of the future.
    Oates K; Goulston K
    Intern Med J; 2012 Apr; 42(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 22498117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: a prospective, longitudinal study.
    McManus IC; Iqbal S; Chandrarajan A; Ferguson E; Leaviss J
    BMC Med Educ; 2005 Dec; 5():38. PubMed ID: 16351718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Have rural background students been disadvantaged by the medical school admission process?
    Wright B; Woloschuk W
    Med Educ; 2008 May; 42(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 18346118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medical students' perceptions of barriers to training at a rural clinical school.
    Jones GI; DeWitt DE; Cross M
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(2):685. PubMed ID: 17532726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.