These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21299604)

  • 41. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school.
    Roberts C; Walton M; Rothnie I; Crossley J; Lyon P; Kumar K; Tiller D
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 18338992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors?
    Simmenroth-Nayda A; Görlich Y
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Apr; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25898946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Older mature students' experiences of applying to study medicine in England: an interview study.
    Mathers J; Parry J
    Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 44(11):1084-94. PubMed ID: 20880007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effectiveness of selection in medical school admissions: evaluation of the outcomes among freshmen.
    Hulsman RL; van der Ende JS; Oort FJ; Michels RP; Casteelen G; Griffioen FM
    Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 17430282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: review.
    Parry J; Mathers J; Stevens A; Parsons A; Lilford R; Spurgeon P; Thomas H
    BMJ; 2006 Apr; 332(7548):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16543300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Are efforts to attract graduate applicants to UK medical schools effective in increasing the participation of under-represented socioeconomic groups? A national cohort study.
    Kumwenda B; Cleland J; Greatrix R; MacKenzie RK; Prescott G
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e018946. PubMed ID: 29444782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Generalizability of a study sample assessment procedure for entrance selection for medical school.
    Oosterveld P; ten Cate O
    Med Teach; 2004 Nov; 26(7):635-9. PubMed ID: 15763855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?
    Greatrix R; Dowell J
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Sep; 20(1):292. PubMed ID: 32891164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Joint Admission Medical Program: a statewide approach to expanding medical education and career opportunities for disadvantaged students.
    Dalley B; Podawiltz A; Castro R; Fallon K; Kott M; Rabek J; Richardson J; Thomson W; Ferry P; Mabry B; Hermesmeyer P; Smith Q
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10):1373-82. PubMed ID: 19881424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Why are there so few working-class applicants to medical schools? Learning from the success stories.
    Mathers J; Parry J
    Med Educ; 2009 Mar; 43(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 19250348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A predictive validity study of medical judgment vignettes to assess students' noncognitive attributes: a 3-year prospective longitudinal study.
    Donnon T; Oddone-Paolucci E; Violato C
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e148-55. PubMed ID: 19241216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Selecting top candidates for medical school selection interviews- a non-compensatory approach.
    Shulruf B; O'Sullivan A; Velan G
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 20(1):113. PubMed ID: 32295582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. New non-cognitive procedures for medical applicant selection: a qualitative analysis in one school.
    Katz S; Vinker S
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():237. PubMed ID: 25376161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. "A chance to show yourself" - how do applicants approach medical school admission essays?
    White JS; Lemay JF; Brownell K; Lockyer J
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(10):e541-8. PubMed ID: 21942490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Audit of admission to medical school: II--Shortlisting and interviews.
    McManus IC; Richards P
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1288-90. PubMed ID: 6437522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is embellishing UCAS personal statements accepted practice in applications to medicine and dentistry?
    Kumwenda B; Dowell J; Husbands A
    Med Teach; 2013 Jul; 35(7):599-603. PubMed ID: 23701249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Medical-school admission policies.
    McManus IC; Lockwood DN
    Lancet; 1979 Jan; 1(8107):106-7. PubMed ID: 84113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Shedding light on the decision to retain an interview for medical student selection.
    Poole P; Shulruf B; Harley B; Monigatti J; Barrow M; Reid P; Prendergast C; Bagg W
    N Z Med J; 2012 Sep; 125(1361):81-8. PubMed ID: 22960719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The change from UMAT to UCAT for undergraduate medical school applicants: impact on selection outcomes.
    Griffin B; Horton GL; Lampe L; Shulruf B; Hu W
    Med J Aust; 2021 Feb; 214(2):84-89. PubMed ID: 33258184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.