These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
703 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21300255)
61. MGBM system: new protocol for Class II non extraction treatment without cooperation. Maino BG; Gianelly AA; Bednar J; Mura P; Maino G Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 17364039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Rapid canine retraction with periodontal distraction in Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report. Durgekar SG; Kumar PS; Kolur N Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(4):21-7. PubMed ID: 23413638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes. Kuroda S; Yamada K; Deguchi T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19268827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. An unusual case of invasive cervical resorption after piezosurgery-assisted en masse retraction. Tunçer Nİ; Köseoğlu-Seçgin C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jul; 156(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31256827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Treatment outcome analysis of speedy surgical orthodontics for adults with maxillary protrusion. Choo H; Heo HA; Yoon HJ; Chung KR; Kim SH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e251-62. PubMed ID: 22133959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Indirect usage of miniscrew anchorage to intrude overerupted mandibular incisors in a Class II patient with a deep overbite. Ishihara Y; Kuroda S; Sugawara Y; Balam TA; Takano-Yamamoto T; Yamashiro T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S113-24. PubMed ID: 23540627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth. Saxena R; Kumar PS; Upadhyay M; Naik V World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 21491000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Canine Retraction Using a Closed Nickel Titanium Coil Spring and an Elastic Module. Khalid Z; Bangash AA; Anwar A; Pasha H; Amin E J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Sep; 28(9):695-698. PubMed ID: 30158036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Distalization of the entire maxillary arch in an adult. Kyung SH; Lee JY; Shin JW; Hong C; Dietz V; Gianelly AA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S123-32. PubMed ID: 19362263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Dental midline correction using two component C-orthodontic mini-implant. Chung KR; Kim SH; Kook YA; Kang YG; Sinclair PM Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):76-86. PubMed ID: 20545095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. A pilot clinical study of Class III surgical patients facilitated by improved accelerated osteogenic orthodontic treatments. Wu J; Jiang JH; Xu L; Liang C; Bai Y; Zou W Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):616-24. PubMed ID: 25347045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Canine-lateral incisor transposition: Controlling root resorption with a bone-anchored T-loop retraction. Hsu YL; Chang CH; Roberts WE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):1039-1050. PubMed ID: 27894525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The effect of buccal corticotomy on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement of maxillary canine. Jahanbakhshi MR; Motamedi AM; Feizbakhsh M; Mogharehabed A Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 27605986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique. Mo SS; Kim SH; Sung SJ; Chung KR; Chun YS; Kook YA; Nelson G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e183-91. PubMed ID: 21300229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Is It Possible to Achieve Favorable Accelerated Dental Changes with No Periodontal Complications When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Assisted by Flapless Corticotomy Compared to Traditional Corticotomy? A Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial. Khlef HN; Hajeer MY ScientificWorldJournal; 2022; 2022():4261248. PubMed ID: 35295761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of bone grafting in corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics in adults. Shoreibah EA; Ibrahim SA; Attia MS; Diab MM J Int Acad Periodontol; 2012 Oct; 14(4):105-13. PubMed ID: 23210199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The effect of single versus multiple piezocisions on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial. Eid FY; El-Kalza AR BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):1024. PubMed ID: 39215274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: da C Monini A; Gandini LG; Vianna AP; Martins RP; Jacob HB Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30741577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Wide Linear Corticotomy and Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Under Local Anesthesia Combined Corticision for Correcting Severe Anterior Protrusion With Insufficient Alveolar Housing. Noh MK; Lee BS; Kim SY; Jeon HH; Kim SH; Nelson G J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):2127-2132. PubMed ID: 28953142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Friction versus frictionless mechanics during maxillary en-masse retraction in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a randomized clinical trial. Magdi S; Abdelsayed FA; Aboulfotouh MH; Fahim FH Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 39011819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]