These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2130044)

  • 1. [Results of a comparative study of skeletal anomaly Class II cases after activator, headgear and combined headgear-activator treatment].
    Papadopoulos MA; Rakosi T
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 2130044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of facial profile changes in individuals with skeletal Class II anomaly treated with activator and activator + occipital headgear].
    Gögen H; Parlar S
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 2489162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
    Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Treatment of Class 2-high Angle cases using the combined activator-occipital headgear].
    Dinçer M
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 2489131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the changes occurring in the vertical direction of the face in cases treated with activator + occipital headgear combination].
    Altuğ Z; Işeri H; Bayazit Z; Gögen H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 2489156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment needs following activator-headgear therapy.
    Bondevik O
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):417-22. PubMed ID: 8702067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Control of vertical dimension in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using a combined activator and extraoral traction appliance].
    Chabre C
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():617-33. PubMed ID: 2490243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
    Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of Class II, division 1, cases with a maxillary traction splint.
    Seçkin O; Surucu R
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Mar; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 2374804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of cervical headgear therapy on point B in class II, division 1 cases].
    Ulgen M; Gögen H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 2489160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
    Demirović D; Filipović M
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.