These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21301466)

  • 1. Toward a successful strategy for publication of medical articles.
    Cappell MS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Feb; 106(2):372-3. PubMed ID: 21301466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
    Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Electronic manuscripts: the periodicals earn money, the referees pay].
    Kelly KB
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Mar 14-20; 102(11):888. PubMed ID: 15835532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The ultimate fate of articles rejected for publication in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde].
    Koene HR; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Dec; 138(49):2443-6. PubMed ID: 7997300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fate of the peer review process at the ESA: long-term outcome of submitted studies over a 5-year period.
    Raptis DA; Oberkofler CE; Gouma D; Garden OJ; Bismuth H; Lerut T; Clavien PA
    Ann Surg; 2010 Nov; 252(5):715-25. PubMed ID: 21037426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Is Tidsskriftet's publishing time too long?].
    Sellevold OF; Bratlid D
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Jun; 130(12):1228-31. PubMed ID: 20567273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The expression "proof" is often misused by reviewers and authors.
    Versprille A
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Jan; 23(1):131-2. PubMed ID: 9037659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?
    Schachat AP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [More rigorous requirements of openness concerning clinical trials. Only manuscripts with all data freely accessible to researchers will be accepted by leading medical journals].
    Milerad J
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Oct; 98(43):4692. PubMed ID: 11715243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.
    Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():679-88. PubMed ID: 15116658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review: is the process broken?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):243. PubMed ID: 22826383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
    Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additional statements from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    CMAJ; 1995 May; 152(10):1647-55. PubMed ID: 7743450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review].
    Grimby G
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3109-10. PubMed ID: 12198929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Authors should know who reviewed their articles].
    Sonnsjö B
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Aug 22-28; 102(34):2333. PubMed ID: 16167638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Authors should know who reviewed their articles].
    Johansson BH
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Jul 11-24; 102(28-29):2094; author reply 2094. PubMed ID: 16097188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.