BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21301690)

  • 1. Peer review - a safety and quality improvement initiative in a general practice.
    Rutherford A
    Aust Fam Physician; 2011; 40(1-2):30-2. PubMed ID: 21301690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voluntary review of quality of care peer review for patient safety.
    Stumpf PG
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 17468051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communities of practice - quality improvement or research in general practice.
    Jiwa M; Chan W; Ross J; Shaw T; Magin PJ
    Aust Fam Physician; 2011; 40(1-2):72-5. PubMed ID: 21301701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Participants' evaluation of a group-based organisational assessment tool in Danish general practice: the Maturity Matrix.
    Buch MS; Edwards A; Eriksson T
    Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(5):311-22. PubMed ID: 20003717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review in clinical radiology practice.
    Kaewlai R; Abujudeh H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W158-62. PubMed ID: 22826416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The objective impact of clinical peer review on hospital quality and safety.
    Edwards MT
    Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 21169223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial.
    Shakespeare TP; Turner M; Chapman A
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Aug; 51(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17635479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Achieving organisational competence for clinical leadership: the role of high performance work systems.
    Leggat SG; Balding C
    J Health Organ Manag; 2013; 27(3):312-29. PubMed ID: 23885396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace.
    Southgate L; Cox J; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; Johnson N; Jolly B; Macdonald E; McAvoy P; McCrorie P; Turner J
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():9-19. PubMed ID: 11895258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GP Networks as enablers of quality of care: implementing a practice engagement framework in a General Practice Network.
    Pearce C; Shearer M; Gardner K; Kelly J; Xu TB
    Aust J Prim Health; 2012; 18(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 22551830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who needs clinical audit?
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH
    Int Dent J; 1994 Oct; 44(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7814122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of the primary care strategy 2005: a study of the experiences of team work among members of primary care teams in County Wexford in 2011.
    Abu OR; NĂ­ Riain A
    Ir Med J; 2012 Feb; 105(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 22455247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of a radiation safety audit program for a research institution.
    Gillette D; Campbell P; Busby B
    Health Phys; 2004 May; 86(5 Suppl):S80-4. PubMed ID: 15069294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linking clinical audit in general dental services to primary care trust clinical governance -- progress report of an approach used in Southend.
    Cannell P
    Prim Dent Care; 2005 Jan; 12(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15703157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual practice and how to improve it.
    Siriwardena AN; Gillam S
    Qual Prim Care; 2014; 22(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 24865340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficient learning with data from own practice--experiences from the SATS-project].
    Carlsen T; Bratland SZ; Claudi T; Cooper J; Telje J; Waaler HM; Hjortdahl P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Nov; 119(29):4306-9. PubMed ID: 10667126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doctor scores on national qualifying examinations predict quality of care in future practice.
    Wenghofer E; Klass D; Abrahamowicz M; Dauphinee D; Jacques A; Smee S; Blackmore D; Winslade N; Reidel K; Bartman I; Tamblyn R
    Med Educ; 2009 Dec; 43(12):1166-73. PubMed ID: 19930507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RCGP Quality Team Development programme: an illuminative evaluation.
    Macfarlane F; Greenhalgh T; Schofield T; Desombre T
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Oct; 13(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 15465939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GPs and charity draw up plan to improve cancer diagnosis in primary care.
    Torjesen I
    BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2756. PubMed ID: 22508948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.