106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21302460)
1. [A photographic scale for evaluating facial pores and analysis of factors associated with pore widening in Chengdu].
Wang Q; Zhou CX; Meng HM; Wang X; Li L
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Sep; 41(5):865-8. PubMed ID: 21302460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating photographic scales of facial pores and diagnostic agreement of tests using latent class models.
Ning Y; Qing Z; Qing W; Li L
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2017 Feb; 19(1):64-67. PubMed ID: 27775445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic facial pore analysis system using multi-scale pore detection.
Sun JY; Kim SW; Lee SH; Choi JE; Ko SJ
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27800641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New image analysis tool for facial pore characterization and assessment.
Dissanayake B; Miyamoto K; Purwar A; Chye R; Matsubara A
Skin Res Technol; 2019 Sep; 25(5):631-638. PubMed ID: 30865350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative research on skin pore widening using a stereoimage optical topometer and Sebutape.
Jo HY; Yu DS; Oh CH
Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 17374057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pore volume is most highly correlated with the visual assessment of skin pores.
Kim SJ; Shin MK; Back JH; Koh JS
Skin Res Technol; 2014 Nov; 20(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 24645873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a photographic scale for consistency and guidance in dermatologic assessment of forearm sun damage.
McKenzie NE; Saboda K; Duckett LD; Goldman R; Hu C; Curiel-Lewandrowski CN
Arch Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 147(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 21242389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method of evaluating facial pores using optical 2D images and analysis of age-dependent changes in facial pores in Koreans.
Jang SI; Kim EJ; Lee HK
Skin Res Technol; 2018 May; 24(2):304-308. PubMed ID: 29383766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating facial pores and skin texture after low-energy nonablative fractional 1440-nm laser treatments.
Saedi N; Petrell K; Arndt K; Dover J
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 23098639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sebum, acne, skin elasticity, and gender difference - which is the major influencing factor for facial pores?
Kim BY; Choi JW; Park KC; Youn SW
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e45-53. PubMed ID: 22211382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A photographic system for the three-dimensional study of facial morphology.
de Menezes M; Rosati R; Allievi C; Sforza C
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1070-7. PubMed ID: 19852596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of digital photographic reference scales for evaluating facial aging signs.
Jdid R; Latreille J; Soppelsa F; Tschachler E; Morizot F
Skin Res Technol; 2018 May; 24(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 29057502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sebum output as a factor contributing to the size of facial pores.
Roh M; Han M; Kim D; Chung K
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 155(5):890-4. PubMed ID: 17034515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serum levels of IGF-1 are related to human skin characteristics including the conspicuousness of facial pores.
Sugiyama-Nakagiri Y; Naoe A; Ohuchi A; Kitahara T
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2011 Apr; 33(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 20646082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antera 3D capabilities for pore measurements.
Messaraa C; Metois A; Walsh M; Flynn J; Doyle L; Robertson N; Mansfield A; O'Connor C; Mavon A
Skin Res Technol; 2018 Nov; 24(4):606-613. PubMed ID: 29707814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the number of enlarged pores according to site, age, and sex.
Jung HJ; Ahn JY; Lee JI; Bae JY; Kim HL; Suh HY; Youn JI; Park MY
Skin Res Technol; 2018 Aug; 24(3):367-370. PubMed ID: 29393550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Influence of Clinical Experience and Photographic Presentation on Age Assessment of Women.
Nielsen BR; Linneberg A; Christensen K; Forman JL; Schwarz P
Gerontology; 2016; 62(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 26382945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
Kantor J
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual assessment of facial elastosis using photographs as a measure of cumulative ultraviolet exposure.
Cameron LL; Vitasa BC; Lewis PG; Taylor HR; Emmett EA
Photodermatol; 1988 Dec; 5(6):277-82. PubMed ID: 3249687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
