These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21302775)

  • 1. Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast.
    O'Connor MK; Li H; Rhodes DJ; Hruska CB; Clancy CB; Vetter RJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6187-98. PubMed ID: 21302775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 20736332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefit to Radiation Risk of Breast-specific Gamma Imaging Compared with Mammography in Screening Asymptomatic Women with Dense Breasts.
    Hendrick RE; Tredennick T
    Radiology; 2016 Nov; 281(2):583-588. PubMed ID: 27257949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation Doses and Risks in Breast Screening.
    Hendrick RE
    J Breast Imaging; 2020 Jun; 2(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 38424982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
    Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part II. Evaluation in patients.
    Hruska CB; Weinmann AL; Tello Skjerseth CM; Wagenaar EM; Conners AL; Tortorelli CL; Maxwell RW; Rhodes DJ; O'Connor MK
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3476-83. PubMed ID: 22755727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21081671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.
    Rhodes DJ; Hruska CB; Conners AL; Tortorelli CL; Maxwell RW; Jones KN; Toledano AY; O'Connor MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 25615744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intensive Imaging Surveillance of Survivors of Breast Cancer May Increase Risk of Radiation-induced Malignancy.
    Meyer C; Millán P; González V; Spera G; Machado A; Mackey JR; Fresco R
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(3):e468-e474. PubMed ID: 30850181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Radiation risk associated with mammography screening examinations for women younger than 50 years of age].
    Nekolla EA; Griebel J; Brix G
    Z Med Phys; 2008; 18(3):170-9. PubMed ID: 18826160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Risks Attributed to Diagnostic Medical Radiation Exposure in Korea, 2013.
    Lim H; Choi J; Kim JH; Cheong HK; Ha M
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 33(29):e211. PubMed ID: 30008633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Just the facts: mammography saves lives with little if any radiation risk to the mature breast.
    Kopans DB
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):578-82. PubMed ID: 21979544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast-Specific γ-Imaging for the Detection of Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Women at Increased Risk.
    Brem RF; Ruda RC; Yang JL; Coffey CM; Rapelyea JA
    J Nucl Med; 2016 May; 57(5):678-84. PubMed ID: 26823569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Benefit-to-Radiation Risk Ratio of Molecular Breast Imaging, Two-Dimensional Full-Field Digital Mammography with and without Tomosynthesis, and Synthetic Mammography with Tomosynthesis.
    Brown M; Covington MF
    Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2019 Sep; 1(1):e190005. PubMed ID: 33778669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal.
    Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Olerud HM; Hole EO; Hofvind S
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1174-9. PubMed ID: 24311702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of BSGI, MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions and their correlations with specific molecular subtypes in Chinese women.
    Liu H; Zhan H; Sun D; Zhang Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Aug; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32799808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using radiation risk models in cancer screening simulations: important assumptions and effects on outcome projections.
    Kong CY; Lee JM; McMahon PM; Lowry KP; Omer ZB; Eisenberg JD; Pandharipande PV; Gazelle GS
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):977-84. PubMed ID: 22357897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance?
    Beemsterboer PM; Warmerdam PG; Boer R; de Koning HJ
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9718526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of breast specific gamma imaging and molecular breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection: Evaluation in phantoms.
    Gong Z; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4250-9. PubMed ID: 26133623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.