260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21302775)
1. Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast.
O'Connor MK; Li H; Rhodes DJ; Hruska CB; Clancy CB; Vetter RJ
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6187-98. PubMed ID: 21302775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.
Hendrick RE
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 20736332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefit to Radiation Risk of Breast-specific Gamma Imaging Compared with Mammography in Screening Asymptomatic Women with Dense Breasts.
Hendrick RE; Tredennick T
Radiology; 2016 Nov; 281(2):583-588. PubMed ID: 27257949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation Doses and Risks in Breast Screening.
Hendrick RE
J Breast Imaging; 2020 Jun; 2(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 38424982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part II. Evaluation in patients.
Hruska CB; Weinmann AL; Tello Skjerseth CM; Wagenaar EM; Conners AL; Tortorelli CL; Maxwell RW; Rhodes DJ; O'Connor MK
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3476-83. PubMed ID: 22755727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21081671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.
Rhodes DJ; Hruska CB; Conners AL; Tortorelli CL; Maxwell RW; Jones KN; Toledano AY; O'Connor MK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 25615744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intensive Imaging Surveillance of Survivors of Breast Cancer May Increase Risk of Radiation-induced Malignancy.
Meyer C; Millán P; González V; Spera G; Machado A; Mackey JR; Fresco R
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(3):e468-e474. PubMed ID: 30850181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Radiation risk associated with mammography screening examinations for women younger than 50 years of age].
Nekolla EA; Griebel J; Brix G
Z Med Phys; 2008; 18(3):170-9. PubMed ID: 18826160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Risks Attributed to Diagnostic Medical Radiation Exposure in Korea, 2013.
Lim H; Choi J; Kim JH; Cheong HK; Ha M
J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 33(29):e211. PubMed ID: 30008633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Just the facts: mammography saves lives with little if any radiation risk to the mature breast.
Kopans DB
Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):578-82. PubMed ID: 21979544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast-Specific γ-Imaging for the Detection of Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Women at Increased Risk.
Brem RF; Ruda RC; Yang JL; Coffey CM; Rapelyea JA
J Nucl Med; 2016 May; 57(5):678-84. PubMed ID: 26823569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Benefit-to-Radiation Risk Ratio of Molecular Breast Imaging, Two-Dimensional Full-Field Digital Mammography with and without Tomosynthesis, and Synthetic Mammography with Tomosynthesis.
Brown M; Covington MF
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2019 Sep; 1(1):e190005. PubMed ID: 33778669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal.
Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Olerud HM; Hole EO; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1174-9. PubMed ID: 24311702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of BSGI, MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions and their correlations with specific molecular subtypes in Chinese women.
Liu H; Zhan H; Sun D; Zhang Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Aug; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32799808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using radiation risk models in cancer screening simulations: important assumptions and effects on outcome projections.
Kong CY; Lee JM; McMahon PM; Lowry KP; Omer ZB; Eisenberg JD; Pandharipande PV; Gazelle GS
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):977-84. PubMed ID: 22357897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance?
Beemsterboer PM; Warmerdam PG; Boer R; de Koning HJ
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9718526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of breast specific gamma imaging and molecular breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection: Evaluation in phantoms.
Gong Z; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4250-9. PubMed ID: 26133623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
