BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21303011)

  • 1. Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.
    Sanders LD; Zobel BH; Freyman RL; Keen R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):301-9. PubMed ID: 21303011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One sound or two? Object-related negativity indexes echo perception.
    Sanders LD; Joh AS; Keen RE; Freyman RL
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1558-70. PubMed ID: 19064498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Difference in precedence effect between children and adults signifies development of sound localization abilities in complex listening tasks.
    Litovsky RY; Godar SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1979-91. PubMed ID: 20968369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention is critical for spatial auditory object formation.
    Zobel BH; Freyman RL; Sanders LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1998-2010. PubMed ID: 25939699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What the precedence effect tells us about room acoustics.
    Clifton RK; Freyman RL; Meo J
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 12013373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of spectral overlap on the echo suppression threshold for single reflection conditions.
    Walther A; Robinson P; Santala O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL158-64. PubMed ID: 23927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of age and background noise on processing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex sound.
    Alain C; McDonald K; Van Roon P
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):126-35. PubMed ID: 22101023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural realignment of spatially separated sound components.
    Salminen NH; Takanen M; Santala O; Alku P; Pulkki V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3356-65. PubMed ID: 26093425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity to Angular and Radial Source Movements as a Function of Acoustic Complexity in Normal and Impaired Hearing.
    Lundbeck M; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Laugesen S; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517717152. PubMed ID: 28675088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of spatial adaptation on auditory motion processing.
    Getzmann S; Lewald J
    Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 272(1-2):21-9. PubMed ID: 21108997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does mismatch negativity reflect auditory motion?
    Altman JA; Vaitulevich SP; Shestopalova LB; Petropavlovskaia EA
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):194-201. PubMed ID: 20542103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A lateralized auditory evoked potential elicited when auditory objects are defined by spatial motion.
    Butcher A; Govenlock SW; Tata MS
    Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 272(1-2):58-68. PubMed ID: 21056097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials.
    Damaschke J; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 15953525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility.
    Brandewie E; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):291-9. PubMed ID: 20649224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Level dominance for the detection of changes in level distribution in sound streams.
    Richards VM; Shen Y; Chubb C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL237-43. PubMed ID: 23927231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence.
    Cheng CH; Hsu WY; Shih YH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Lin YY
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20600746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological and psychophysical asymmetries in sensitivity to interaural correlation gaps and implications for binaural integration time.
    Lüddemann H; Kollmeier B; Riedel H
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():170-187. PubMed ID: 26526276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.