357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21303019)
21. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine.
Pohjalainen J; Raitio T; Yrttiaho S; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Temporal envelope compensation for robust phoneme recognition using modulation spectrum.
Ganapathy S; Thomas S; Hermansky H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3769-80. PubMed ID: 21218908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
Xu L; Zheng Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multiexpert automatic speech recognition using acoustic and myoelectric signals.
Chan AD; Englehart KB; Hudgins B; Lovely DF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):676-85. PubMed ID: 16602574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The mutual roles of temporal glimpsing and vocal characteristics in cocktail-party listening.
Vestergaard MD; Fyson NR; Patterson RD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):429-39. PubMed ID: 21786910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech.
McAuliffe MJ; Gibson EM; Kerr SE; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1358-68. PubMed ID: 23927132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Myoelectric signal classification for phoneme-based speech recognition.
Scheme EJ; Hudgins B; Parker PA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):694-9. PubMed ID: 17405376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Toward optimizing stream fusion in multistream recognition of speech.
Mesgarani N; Thomas S; Hermansky H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL14-8. PubMed ID: 21786862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Temporal resolution analysis in frequency domain linear prediction.
Ganapathy S; Hermansky H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL436-42. PubMed ID: 23145707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Brand T; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials.
Nissen SL; Harris RW; Channell RW; Conklin B; Kim M; Wong L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 21319936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perceptual development of phoneme contrasts: how sensitivity changes along acoustic dimensions that contrast phoneme categories.
Heeren WF; Schouten ME
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2291-302. PubMed ID: 19062867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automatic speech recognition in cocktail-party situations: a specific training for separated speech.
Marti A; Cobos M; Lopez JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1529-35. PubMed ID: 22352522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microscopic prediction of speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing in noise using an auditory model.
Jürgens T; Brand T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2635-48. PubMed ID: 19894841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spectral and Temporal Envelope Cues for Human and Automatic Speech Recognition in Noise.
Hu G; Determan SC; Dong Y; Beeve AT; Collins JE; Gai Y
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 21(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 31758279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
