These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21303090)

  • 21. Slow update stochastic simulation algorithms for modeling complex biochemical networks.
    Ghosh D; De RK
    Biosystems; 2017 Dec; 162():135-146. PubMed ID: 29080799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficient computation of parameter sensitivities of discrete stochastic chemical reaction networks.
    Rathinam M; Sheppard PW; Khammash M
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Jan; 132(3):034103. PubMed ID: 20095724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Time-ordered product expansions for computational stochastic system biology.
    Mjolsness E
    Phys Biol; 2013 Jun; 10(3):035009. PubMed ID: 23735739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficient simulation of stochastic chemical kinetics with the Stochastic Bulirsch-Stoer extrapolation method.
    Székely T; Burrage K; Zygalakis KC; Barrio M
    BMC Syst Biol; 2014 Jun; 8():71. PubMed ID: 24939084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hybrid deterministic/stochastic simulation of complex biochemical systems.
    Lecca P; Bagagiolo F; Scarpa M
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Nov; 13(12):2672-2686. PubMed ID: 29058744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adaptive hybrid simulations for multiscale stochastic reaction networks.
    Hepp B; Gupta A; Khammash M
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Jan; 142(3):034118. PubMed ID: 25612700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new class of highly efficient exact stochastic simulation algorithms for chemical reaction networks.
    Ramaswamy R; González-Segredo N; Sbalzarini IF
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Jun; 130(24):244104. PubMed ID: 19566139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hybrid modeling and simulation of stochastic effects on progression through the eukaryotic cell cycle.
    Liu Z; Pu Y; Li F; Shaffer CA; Hoops S; Tyson JJ; Cao Y
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Jan; 136(3):034105. PubMed ID: 22280742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An accelerated algorithm for discrete stochastic simulation of reaction-diffusion systems using gradient-based diffusion and tau-leaping.
    Koh W; Blackwell KT
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Apr; 134(15):154103. PubMed ID: 21513371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adaptive tree-based search for stochastic simulation algorithm.
    Thanh VH; Zunino R
    Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2014; 7(4):341-57. PubMed ID: 25539846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Block Search Stochastic Simulation Algorithm (BlSSSA): A Fast Stochastic Simulation Algorithm for Modeling Large Biochemical Networks.
    Ghosh D; De RK
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(4):2111-2123. PubMed ID: 33788690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variable time-stepping in the pathwise numerical solution of the chemical Langevin equation.
    Ilie S
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(23):234110. PubMed ID: 23267474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The sorting direct method for stochastic simulation of biochemical systems with varying reaction execution behavior.
    McCollum JM; Peterson GD; Cox CD; Simpson ML; Samatova NF
    Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Feb; 30(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 16321569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A dominated coupling from the past algorithm for the stochastic simulation of networks of biochemical reactions.
    Hemberg M; Barahona M
    BMC Syst Biol; 2008 May; 2():42. PubMed ID: 18466612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hybrid stochastic simulation of reaction-diffusion systems with slow and fast dynamics.
    Strehl R; Ilie S
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Dec; 143(23):234108. PubMed ID: 26696047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantifying stochastic effects in biochemical reaction networks using partitioned leaping.
    Harris LA; Piccirilli AM; Majusiak ER; Clancy P
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 May; 79(5 Pt 1):051906. PubMed ID: 19518479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stochastic simulation of biochemical reactions with partial-propensity and rejection-based approaches.
    Thanh VH
    Math Biosci; 2017 Oct; 292():67-75. PubMed ID: 28782515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multinomial tau-leaping method for stochastic kinetic simulations.
    Pettigrew MF; Resat H
    J Chem Phys; 2007 Feb; 126(8):084101. PubMed ID: 17343434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Asynchronous τ-leaping.
    Jȩdrzejewski-Szmek Z; Blackwell KT
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Mar; 144(12):125104. PubMed ID: 27036481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improved delay-leaping simulation algorithm for biochemical reaction systems with delays.
    Yi N; Zhuang G; Da L; Wang Y
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Apr; 136(14):144108. PubMed ID: 22502502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.