399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21303181)
1. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
Petrie CS; Williams JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of bone to implant contact percentage on bone remodelling surrounding a dental implant.
Lian Z; Guan H; Ivanovski S; Loo YC; Johnson NW; Zhang H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 39(7):690-8. PubMed ID: 20418064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on periimplant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter, short implant and a narrow-diameter, long implant.
Chou HY; Müftü S; Bozkaya D
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 20970535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.
Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.
Geng JP; Xu DW; Tan KB; Liu GR
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15453222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
