These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Micro-gap formations in Class V restorations using 4 types of composites and glass ionomer linings]. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg K; Bogdan MS Tidsskr Tandlaeger; 1986 Apr; 6(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 3462962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity study in vivo: glass-ionomer versus zinc-phosphate bases beneath amalgam restorations. Scherer W; Cooper H; Kaim J; Hittleman E; Staffa J Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):193-6. PubMed ID: 2098729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A rationale for use of bases with amalgam restorations. Bartlett DW Dent Update; 1992 Dec; 19(10):413-4, 416-7. PubMed ID: 1303355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of four composite resins over a glass ionomer cement base in Class V restorations. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg KB; Bogdan MS Quintessence Int; 1985 Dec; 16(12):817-20. PubMed ID: 3868783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations. Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative investigation of compressive resistance of glass-cermet cements used as a core material in post-core systems]. Ersoy E; Cetiner S; Koçak F Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 2518746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement. Croll TP Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer. Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. Burgess JO; Barghi N; Chan DC; Hummert T Am J Dent; 1993 Jun; 6(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 8240775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal leakage of restorations using a glass-ionomer liner in bonding composite resins to dentin. Hembree JH; Tindle RR; Strange C Miss Dent Assoc J; 1990; 46(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2197543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface characteristics of glass-ionomer cements when treated with cavity varnish. O'Hara JW; Lentz DL; Taylor TJ Oper Dent; 1989; 14(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 2637997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]