These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2130348)
21. Clinical placement of modern glass-ionomer cements. Mount GJ Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8511271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [A dangerous error: etching of glass ionomers in the sandwich technic]. Goldberg M; Apap M Chir Dent Fr; 1987 Nov; 57(401):45-7. PubMed ID: 3329600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A national survey on the use of glass-ionomer cements. Reinhardt JW; Swift EJ; Bolden AJ Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 8337182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices. Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins. Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of restorative materials on the adaptation of two bases and a dentin bonding agent to internal cavity walls. McConnell RJ; Boksman L; Hunter JK; Gratton DR Quintessence Int; 1986 Nov; 17(11):703-10. PubMed ID: 3538115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Resin-modified glass ionomers: a new option in restorative dentistry. Fruits TJ; Miranda FJ J Okla Dent Assoc; 1996; 86(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 9540700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional glass ionomers, resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins--an in vitro study. Setty JV; Singh S; Subba Reddy VV J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):55-69. PubMed ID: 14700337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Cavity lining for composite restorations: critical estimate]. Brännström M; Mattsson B; Torstenson B Quintessenz; 1988 Feb; 39(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 3166150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation. de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biological and clinical investigations of a glass ionomer base material. Schmalz G; Thonemann B; Riedel M; Elderton RJ Dent Mater; 1994 Sep; 10(5):304-13. PubMed ID: 7498591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Liners and bases in general dentistry. Weiner R Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56 Suppl 1():11-22. PubMed ID: 21564112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]