These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2130373)

  • 1. Hemifield differences in perceived spatial frequency.
    Edgar GK; Smith AT
    Perception; 1990; 19(6):759-66. PubMed ID: 2130373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Monocular Spatial Cues on Vergence Eye Movements in Monocular and Binocular Viewing of 3-D and 2-D Stimuli.
    Batvinionak AA; Gracheva MA; Bolshakov AS; Rozhkova GI
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1077-84. PubMed ID: 26562921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monocular and dichoptic interactions between moving and stationary stimuli.
    Wade NJ; Swanston MT
    Perception; 1993; 22(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 8041594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant.
    Kitterle FL; Hellige JB; Christman S
    Brain Cogn; 1992 Nov; 20(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 1449760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of primary visual cortex in the binocular integration of plaid motion perception.
    Saint-Amour D; Walsh V; Guillemot JP; Lassonde M; Lepore F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1107-15. PubMed ID: 15787716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemifield differences in perceived velocity.
    Smith AT; Hammond P
    Perception; 1986; 15(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 3774482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.
    Kitterle FL; Christman S; Hellige JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 2243753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles.
    Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objects look different sizes in the right and left eyes.
    McManus IC; Tomlinson J
    Laterality; 2004 Jul; 9(3):245-65. PubMed ID: 15341425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anisotropies in the perceived spatial displacement of motion-defined contours: opposite biases in the upper-left and lower-right visual quadrants.
    Fan Z; Harris J
    Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2101-9. PubMed ID: 20673777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinguishing subcortical and cortical influences in visual attention. Subcortical attentional processing.
    Zackon DH; Casson EJ; Stelmach L; Faubert J; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 9040469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual acuity and hemispheric asymmetries in pigeons.
    Güntürkün O; Hahmann U
    Behav Brain Res; 1994 Feb; 60(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 8003246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retinal and cortical patterns of spatial anisotropy in contrast sensitivity tasks.
    Silva MF; Maia-Lopes S; Mateus C; Guerreiro M; Sampaio J; Faria P; Castelo-Branco M
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 18067943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatio-temporal discrimination of frequency in the right and left visual fields: a preliminary report.
    Rao SM; Rourke D; Whitman RD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):311-6. PubMed ID: 7290879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric asymmetry for spatially filtered stimuli belonging to different semantic categories.
    Viggiano MP; Costantini A; Vannucci M; Righi S
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):519-24. PubMed ID: 15268928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance under dichoptic versus binocular viewing conditions: effects of attention and task requirements.
    Kimchi R; Gopher D; Rubin Y; Raij D
    Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 8509105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are monocular arrays discriminable from binocular arrays?
    Kunzendorf RG; Butler W; Pearson B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):531-4. PubMed ID: 3399330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The binocular representation of uniform motion.
    Swanston MT; Wade NJ; Ono H
    Perception; 1990; 19(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 2336332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification.
    Peterzell DH; Harvey LO; Hardyck CD
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 2813029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.