BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21305479)

  • 21. Practical application of nonrandomized research to patient care: a case study of nesiritide.
    Winegardner ML; Reaume KT; Dabaja GS; Kalus JS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2007 Jan; 27(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17192168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analyses of chronic disease trials with competing causes of death may yield biased odds ratios.
    Koller MT; Stijnen T; Steyerberg EW; Lubsen J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 18313561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Systematic reviews of medical evidence: the use of meta-analysis in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Peipert JF; Bracken MB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 9083325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A meta-analytic approach to determine the state of the science on implant dentistry.
    Proskin HM; Jeffcoat RL; Catlin A; Campbell J; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():11-8. PubMed ID: 18437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2810. PubMed ID: 11107932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.
    Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M;
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inconsistent results in meta-analyses for the prevention of falls are found between study-level data and patient-level data.
    Haines TP; Hill AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 20947297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
    Korttila K; Apfel CC
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accumulating scientific evidence in cardiology with special reference to the Japanese contribution.
    Origasa H
    Heart Vessels; 1997; Suppl 12():142-7. PubMed ID: 9476566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: an empirical example.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Mozurkewich EL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Mar; 32(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 21147265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
    Pinto A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in clinical research: a review of methods and applications.
    Verde PE; Ohmann C
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 26035469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pharmacology and statistics: recommendations to strengthen a productive partnership.
    Spector R; Vesell ES
    Pharmacology; 2006; 78(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 17008772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-analysis: mistake or milestone in medicine?
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Alba AC; Ross H
    Heart; 2018 Oct; 104(19):1559-1561. PubMed ID: 29602884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A practical guide to research: design, execution, and publication.
    ; Audigé L; Ayeni OR; Bhandari M; Boyle BW; Briggs KK; Chan K; Chaney-Barclay K; Do HT; Ferretti M; Fu FH; Goldhahn J; Goldhahn S; Hidaka C; Hoang-Kim A; Karlsson J; Krych AJ; LaPrade RF; Levy BA; Lubowitz JH; Lyman S; Ma Y; Marx RG; Mohtadi N; Marcheggiani Muccioli GM; Nakamura N; Nguyen J; Poehling GG; Roberts LE; Rosenberg N; Shea KP; Sohani ZN; Soudry M; Voineskos S; Zaffagnini S;
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Apr; 27(4 Suppl):S1-112. PubMed ID: 21749939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.