251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21305479)
41. [Methods of investigation in clinical cardiology. VIII. Meta-analysis and systematic reviews in cardiology].
Guallar E; Damián J; Martín-Moreno JM
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1997 May; 50(5):345-54. PubMed ID: 9281014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Meta-analysis: methods, strengths, and weaknesses.
Buyse M; Piedbois P; Piedbois Y; Carlson RW
Oncology (Williston Park); 2000 Mar; 14(3):437-43; discussion 444, 447. PubMed ID: 10742969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Combining molecular and genetic data from different sources.
Ntzani EE; Khoury MJ; Ioannidis JP
IARC Sci Publ; 2011; (163):323-36. PubMed ID: 22997870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical studies in spinal surgery.
Hanson B; Kopjar B
Eur Spine J; 2005 Oct; 14(8):721-5. PubMed ID: 15940476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
Cappelleri JC; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH; de Ferranti SD; Aubert M; Chalmers TC; Lau J
JAMA; 1996 Oct 23-30; 276(16):1332-8. PubMed ID: 8861993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Meta-analysis in neuropsychology: basic approaches, findings, and applications.
Demakis GJ
Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Feb; 20(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 16393918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Meta-analysis: a practical decision making tool for surgeons.
Panesar SS; Bhandari M; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
Int J Surg; 2009 Aug; 7(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 19464394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The (non)comparability of the correlation effect size across different measurement procedures: a challenge to meta-analysis as a tool for identifying "evidence based practices".
Nugent WR
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2011 May; 8(3):253-74. PubMed ID: 21660822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Hotline update of clinical trials and registries presented at the German Cardiac Society Meeting 2007: 2L-Registry, Kardio-Pro, EVER, AFFECT, VTACH, ARTS II, OPTAMI, PEPCAD I, PEPCAD II, GERSHWIN, SPICE, FIX-CHF and CREDIT.
Rosenkranz S; Maier LS; Maack C; Böhm M
Clin Res Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 96(7):457-68. PubMed ID: 17541489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough.
Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9096):123-7. PubMed ID: 9439507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Reading and interpreting meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies].
Schueler S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):799-803. PubMed ID: 21882129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Deficits and remedy of the standard random effects methods in meta-analysis.
Ziegler S; Koch A; Victor N
Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 11424301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Critical reading of clinical trials].
Aptel F; Cucherat M; Blumen-Ohana E; Denis P
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Dec; 34(10):755-61. PubMed ID: 21992992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [How to read a meta-analysis?].
Moulis G; Sommet A
Rev Med Interne; 2014 Apr; 35(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 24029290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Meta-analysis in neuropsychology: an introduction.
Demakis GJ
Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Feb; 20(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 16393917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?
Anello C; Fleiss JL
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 7853037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, I: clinical trials.
Collins R; MacMahon S
Lancet; 2001 Feb; 357(9253):373-80. PubMed ID: 11211013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Understanding and evaluating meta-analysis.
Dawson DV; Pihlstrom BL; Blanchette DR
J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Apr; 147(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 26705602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Pereira C; Castilho E
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions.
Shadish WR; Cook TD
Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():607-29. PubMed ID: 18616391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
