These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21305479)
81. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. Slavin RE J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 7853053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Letter to the editor: a comment on Lynch et al. (2009). Lincoln TM Psychol Med; 2010 May; 40(5):877-80. PubMed ID: 19917145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
84. Getting it right: being smarter about clinical trials. Kramer BS; Wilentz J; Alexander D; Burklow J; Friedman LM; Hodes R; Kirschstein R; Patterson A; Rodgers G; Straus SE PLoS Med; 2006 Apr; 3(6):e144. PubMed ID: 16608383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Guidelines on How to Perform a Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery: Strengths and Weaknesses of Design. Gendelberg D; Slattery CA; Verma K Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Feb; 32(1):30-31. PubMed ID: 30222619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Structural Approach to Bias in Meta-analyses. Shrier I Res Synth Methods; 2011 Dec; 2(4):223-37. PubMed ID: 26061887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Credibility of subgroup findings in clinical trials and meta-analyses. Myles P; Kasza J; Turner T Br J Anaesth; 2021 Jul; 127(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 33992396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
90. Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot assess the impact of additional evidence on a meta-analysis. Langan D; Higgins JP; Gregory W; Sutton AJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 22342263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Review of analytical methods for prospective cohort studies using time to event data: single studies and implications for meta-analysis. Bennett DA Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Aug; 12(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 12939098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. ACP Journal Club. The devil is in the details...or not? A primer on individual patient data meta-analysis. Sud S; Douketis J Ann Intern Med; 2009 Jul; 151(2):JC1-2, JC1-3. PubMed ID: 19620147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
94. Pneumococcal vaccines: confronting the confounders. Jefferson T Lancet; 2009 Jun; 373(9680):2008-9. PubMed ID: 19524765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
95. Statistics in Brief: An Introduction to the Use of Propensity Scores. Inacio MC; Chen Y; Paxton EW; Namba RS; Kurtz SM; Cafri G Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2722-6. PubMed ID: 25773902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
96. [Meta-analyses. A tool for maximizing therapy study evidence?]. Maier W; Möller HJ Nervenarzt; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1028-36. PubMed ID: 17687536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. [Limitations of meta-analysis from published data in epidemiological research]. Blettner M; Schlehofer B; Sauerbrei W Soz Praventivmed; 1997; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 9221627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Meta-analytic rage or race for evidence-based interventional cardiology? Biondi-Zoccai G EuroIntervention; 2009 Sep; 5(4):409, 411; author reply 411, 413. PubMed ID: 19755325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
99. [Evidence-based medicine. Input of epidemiologic studies]. Reginster JY; Betz R Rev Med Liege; 2000 Apr; 55(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 10909302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. A novel application of the file drawer formula: rejected study bias in meta-analysis. Reed J Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):703-6. PubMed ID: 20099530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]