These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21306359)

  • 1. Contaminant plume classification system based on mass discharge.
    Newell CJ; Farhat SK; Adamson DT; Looney BB
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(6):914-9. PubMed ID: 21306359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of temporally variable groundwater flow conditions on point measurements and contaminant mass flux estimations.
    Rein A; Bauer S; Dietrich P; Beyer C
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep; 108(3-4):118-33. PubMed ID: 19682766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A PCE groundwater plume discharging to a river: influence of the streambed and near-river zone on contaminant distributions.
    Conant B; Cherry JA; Gillham RW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):249-79. PubMed ID: 15336797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dilution and volatilization of groundwater contaminant discharges in streams.
    Aisopou A; Bjerg PL; Sonne AT; Balbarini N; Rosenberg L; Binning PJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():71-83. PubMed ID: 25496819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical experiments and field results on the size of steady state plumes.
    Maier U; Grathwohl P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 May; 85(1-2):33-52. PubMed ID: 16500721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of field-observed and model-predicted plume trends at fuel-contaminated sites: implications for natural attenuation rates.
    Jeong SW; Kampbell DH; An YJ; Henry BM
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Nov; 7(11):1099-104. PubMed ID: 16252060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mass transport in groundwater near hanging-wall interceptors.
    Hudak PF
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 Feb; 42(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 17365297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical modelling of fringe and core biodegradation in groundwater plumes.
    Gutierrez-Neri M; Ham PA; Schotting RJ; Lerner DN
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Jun; 107(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 19386379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple method for calculating growth rates of petroleum hydrocarbon plumes.
    Bekins BA; Cozzarelli IM; Curtis GP
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 16324003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple contaminant fate and transport modelling tool for management and risk assessment of groundwater pollution from contaminated sites.
    Locatelli L; Binning PJ; Sanchez-Vila X; Søndergaard GL; Rosenberg L; Bjerg PL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Feb; 221():35-49. PubMed ID: 30638639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the natural attenuation of organic contaminants in aquifers using plume-scale electron and carbon balances: model development with analysis of uncertainty and parameter sensitivity.
    Thornton SF; Lerner DN; Banwart SA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2001 Dec; 53(3-4):199-232. PubMed ID: 11820471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integral quantification of contaminant mass flow rates in a contaminated aquifer: conditioning of the numerical inversion of concentration-time series.
    Herold M; Ptak T; Bayer-Raich M; Wendel T; Grathwohl P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 19167131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of first-order degradation rate constants from monitoring networks.
    Beyer C; Chen C; Gronewold J; Kolditz O; Bauer S
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(6):774-85. PubMed ID: 17973755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing confidence in mass discharge estimates using geostatistical methods.
    Cai Z; Wilson RD; Cardiff MA; Kitanidis PK
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 20477878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fringe-controlled biodegradation under dynamic conditions: quasi 2-D flow-through experiments and reactive-transport modeling.
    Eckert D; Kürzinger P; Bauer R; Griebler C; Cirpka OA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():100-11. PubMed ID: 25496820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Source-zone characterization of a chlorinated-solvent contaminated Superfund site in Tucson, AZ.
    Brusseau ML; Nelson NT; Zhang Z; Blue JE; Rohrer J; Allen T
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Feb; 90(1-2):21-40. PubMed ID: 17049404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remediating Contaminant Plumes in Groundwater with Shallow Excavations Containing Coarse Reactive Media.
    Hudak PF
    Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 61(2):304-309. PubMed ID: 29282532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Groundwater-surface water interaction and its role on TCE groundwater plume attenuation.
    Chapman SW; Parker BL; Cherry JA; Aravena R; Hunkeler D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 May; 91(3-4):203-32. PubMed ID: 17182152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reactive dispersive contaminant transport in coastal aquifers: numerical simulation of a reactive Henry problem.
    Nick HM; Raoof A; Centler F; Thullner M; Regnier P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Feb; 145():90-104. PubMed ID: 23334209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicomponent simulations of contrasting redox environments at an LNAPL site.
    Miles B; Peter A; Teutsch G
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(5):727-42. PubMed ID: 18459956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.