These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21306616)

  • 1. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 21306616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of sensation evoked by electrocutaneous stimulation on forearm in nondisabled subjects.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Petrini L; Jensen W
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 22773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.
    Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preferential activation of small cutaneous fibers through small pin electrode also depends on the shape of a long duration electrical current.
    Hugosdottir R; Mørch CD; Andersen OK; Helgason T; Arendt-Nielsen L
    BMC Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 31521103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception thresholds and qualitative perceptions for electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Dölker EM; Lau S; Bernhard MA; Haueisen J
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7335. PubMed ID: 35513410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Channel-hopping during surface electrical neurostimulation elicits selective, comfortable, distally referred sensations.
    Pena AE; Abbas JJ; Jung R
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Apr; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33770781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at threshold: the effects of electrode size.
    Higashiyama A; Tashiro T
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 2243763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating stimulation parameters for preferential small-fiber activation using exponentially rising electrical currents.
    Hugosdottir R; Mørch CD; Andersen OK; Arendt-Nielsen L
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Oct; 122(4):1745-1752. PubMed ID: 31461369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiology of perception: cortical stimulation and recording in humans.
    Ray PG; Meador KJ; Smith JR; Wheless JW; Sittenfeld M; Clifton GL
    Neurology; 1999 Mar; 52(5):1044-9. PubMed ID: 10102426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm.
    Geng B; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 11():97. PubMed ID: 24908048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in perception and brain activation following stimulation by large versus small area cutaneous surface electrodes.
    Lelic D; Mørch CD; Hennings K; Andersen OK; Drewes AM
    Eur J Pain; 2012 Jul; 16(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 22337577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception threshold and electrode position for spinal cord stimulation.
    He J; Barolat G; Holsheimer J; Struijk JJ
    Pain; 1994 Oct; 59(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 7854803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems.
    Szeto AY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1982; 10(4):175-92. PubMed ID: 7171152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discriminability of multiple cutaneous and proprioceptive hand percepts evoked by intraneural stimulation with Utah slanted electrode arrays in human amputees.
    Page DM; George JA; Wendelken SM; Davis TS; Kluger DT; Hutchinson DT; Clark GA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 33478534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Localization of electrocutaneous stimuli on the fingers and forearm: effects of electrode configuration and body axis.
    Higashiyama A; Hayashi M
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8351181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrocutaneous stimulation I. The effects of stimulus parameters on absolute threshold.
    Girvin JP; Marks LE; Antunes JL; Quest DO; O'Keefe MD; Ning P; Dobelle WH
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):524-8. PubMed ID: 7167349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays.
    Rizzo JF; Wyatt J; Loewenstein J; Kelly S; Shire D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 44(12):5355-61. PubMed ID: 14638738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.