BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21307833)

  • 1. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay.
    O'Toole GA
    J Vis Exp; 2011 Jan; (47):. PubMed ID: 21307833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of tetrazolium salt assay for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm using microtiter plate method.
    Sabaeifard P; Abdi-Ali A; Soudi MR; Dinarvand R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Oct; 105():134-40. PubMed ID: 25086178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of biofilm formation by pseudomonas aeruginosa and hydrodynamic evaluation of microtiter plate assay.
    Samad A; Khan AA; Sajid M; Zahra R
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 May; 69(5):666-671. PubMed ID: 31105285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biofilm Formation and Quantification Using the 96-Microtiter Plate.
    Thibeaux R; Kainiu M; Goarant C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2134():207-214. PubMed ID: 32632872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
    Cassat JE; Lee CY; Smeltzer MS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 391():127-44. PubMed ID: 18025674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A colorimetric microtiter plate method for assessment of phage effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.
    Knezevic P; Petrovic O
    J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Aug; 74(2-3):114-8. PubMed ID: 18433900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biofilm formation in the 96-well microtiter plate.
    Coffey BM; Anderson GG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1149():631-41. PubMed ID: 24818938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    Katharios-Lanwermeyer S; Whitfield GB; Howell PL; O'Toole GA
    mBio; 2021 Feb; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 33531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation.
    Stepanovic S; Vukovic D; Dakic I; Savic B; Svabic-Vlahovic M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2000 Apr; 40(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 10699673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Macroscale versus microscale methods for physiological analysis of biofilms formed in 96-well microtiter plates.
    Gomes LC; Moreira JM; Miranda JM; Simões M; Melo LF; Mergulhão FJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 24140575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three-component regulatory system regulates biofilm maturation and type III secretion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Kuchma SL; Connolly JP; O'Toole GA
    J Bacteriol; 2005 Feb; 187(4):1441-54. PubMed ID: 15687209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thermoregulation of
    Kim S; Li XH; Hwang HJ; Lee JH
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Oct; 86(22):. PubMed ID: 32917757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of drip flow and rotating disk reactors for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm analysis.
    Schwartz K; Stephenson R; Hernandez M; Jambang N; Boles BR
    J Vis Exp; 2010 Dec; (46):. PubMed ID: 21206478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Static biofilm cultures of Gram-positive pathogens grown in a microtiter format used for anti-biofilm drug discovery.
    Kwasny SM; Opperman TJ
    Curr Protoc Pharmacol; 2010 Sep; Chapter 13():Unit 13A.8. PubMed ID: 22294365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An update on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation, tolerance, and dispersal.
    Harmsen M; Yang L; Pamp SJ; Tolker-Nielsen T
    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 59(3):253-68. PubMed ID: 20497222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biofilm-forming capacity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ocular infections.
    Hou W; Sun X; Wang Z; Zhang Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5624-31. PubMed ID: 22736609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biofilm dispersion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Kim SK; Lee JH
    J Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 54(2):71-85. PubMed ID: 26832663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A semi-quantitative approach to assess biofilm formation using wrinkled colony development.
    Ray VA; Morris AR; Visick KL
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):e4035. PubMed ID: 22710417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Matrix Polysaccharides and SiaD Diguanylate Cyclase Alter Community Structure and Competitiveness of
    Chew SC; Yam JKH; Matysik A; Seng ZJ; Klebensberger J; Givskov M; Doyle P; Rice SA; Yang L; Kjelleberg S
    mBio; 2018 Nov; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 30401769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microtiter susceptibility testing of microbes growing on peg lids: a miniaturized biofilm model for high-throughput screening.
    Harrison JJ; Stremick CA; Turner RJ; Allan ND; Olson ME; Ceri H
    Nat Protoc; 2010 Jul; 5(7):1236-54. PubMed ID: 20595953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 63.