These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21308752)

  • 41. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
    Jung S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.
    McCabe DP; Castel AD; Rhodes MG
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 21751243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
    Miller MK; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 17051441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Weight bias among dietetics students: implications for treatment practices.
    Puhl R; Wharton C; Heuer C
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Mar; 109(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 19248859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The bastard verdict and its influence on jurors.
    Curley LJ; MacLean R; Murray J; Laybourn P; Brown D
    Med Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 59(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30501474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Deciding the fate of others: the cognitive underpinnings of racially biased juror decision making.
    Kleider HM; Knuycky LR; Cavrak SE
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(3):175-93. PubMed ID: 24837019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Medical malpractice: a case study in medical and legal decision making.
    Piccirillo M; Graf GJ
    Yale J Biol Med; 1989; 62(1):23-42. PubMed ID: 2728499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Expert evidence, the adversary system, and the jury.
    Vidmar N
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S137-43. PubMed ID: 16030330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence.
    London K; Nunez N
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):932-9. PubMed ID: 11125657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of child interview tactics on prospective jurors' decisions.
    Johnson JL; Shelley AE
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):846-66. PubMed ID: 25470811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Perceptions of medical malpractice and medical malpractice reform among first- and fourth-year medical students.
    Kelly ET; Miller EA
    Health Policy; 2009 Jun; 91(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 19117636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
    Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Juror reactions to jury duty: perceptions of the system and potential stressors.
    Bornstein BH; Miller MK; Nemeth RJ; Page GL; Musil S
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(3):321-46. PubMed ID: 15968710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence.
    Woody WD; Forrest KD
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The consolidation of plaintiffs: the effects of number of plaintiffs on jurors' liability decisions, damage awards, and cognitive processing of evidence.
    Horowitz IA; Bordens KS
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):909-18. PubMed ID: 11125655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors' application of instructions.
    Baguley CM; McKimmie BM; Masser BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):284-304. PubMed ID: 28182459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.