204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21308830)
1. Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound.
Bamberg C; Scheuermann S; Slowinski T; Dückelmann AM; Vogt M; Nguyen-Dobinsky TN; Streitparth F; Teichgräber U; Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 21308830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound.
Bamberg C; Scheuermann S; Fotopoulou C; Slowinski T; Dückelmann AM; Teichgräber U; Streitparth F; Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 206(2):161.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22177192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal head descent assessed by transabdominal ultrasound: a prospective observational study.
Kamel R; Negm S; Badr I; Kahrs BH; Eggebø TM; Iversen JK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):112.e1-112.e10. PubMed ID: 34389293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of fetal head descent using the 'angle of progression' on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise.
Dückelmann AM; Bamberg C; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Nonnenmacher A; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Feb; 35(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 20069668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor.
Chaemsaithong P; Kwan AHW; Tse WT; Lim WT; Chan WWY; Chong KC; Leung TY; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):592.e1-592.e15. PubMed ID: 30735668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 21630362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal descent in nulliparous women assessed by ultrasound: a longitudinal study.
Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):378.e1-378.e15. PubMed ID: 33039395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room.
Usman S; Wilkinson M; Barton H; Lees CC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(20):3442-3451. PubMed ID: 29712501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.
Eggebø TM; Hassan WA; Salvesen KÅ; Lindtjørn E; Lees CC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 24105705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Descent of the presenting part assessed with ultrasound.
Eggebø TM; Hjartardottir H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S901-S912. PubMed ID: 34461079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head-perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery.
Chan YT; Ng VK; Yung WK; Lo TK; Leung WC; Lau WL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1476-81. PubMed ID: 25163523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound.
Barbera AF; Pombar X; Perugino G; Lezotte DC; Hobbins JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 19248000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head elevation by maneuvers used for managing umbilical cord prolapse.
Kwan AHW; Chaemsaithong P; Wong L; Tse WT; Hui ASY; Poon LC; Leung TY
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 58(4):603-608. PubMed ID: 33219729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When does fetal head rotation occur in spontaneous labor at term: results of an ultrasound-based longitudinal study in nulliparous women.
Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):514.e1-514.e9. PubMed ID: 33207231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
