98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21309348)
1. Form an effective compliance program.
Evans VB
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2011 Jan; 43(1):24. PubMed ID: 21309348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stamping out fraud. The model compliance program.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Dec; 29(12):34-5. PubMed ID: 10175641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Compliance crosswalk: you're not off the hot seat.
Rozovsky FA
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 May; 23(5):89-91. PubMed ID: 10179051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Combating billing problems. Regulatory compliance programs offer many benefits.
Burns LP
Mich Health Hosp; 1997; 33(6):34. PubMed ID: 10173855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Crisis prevention and damage control: managing whistle-blowers.
Queen D
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1999 Aug; 31(8):16-21. PubMed ID: 10558023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. As we see it. Compliance: back to the future.
Bills T; Swan C; Brewer J; Fouché J; Coleman J; du Treil C; Lanier L
Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1998; 12(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 10185019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Golden labs. Laboratories look to newer systems to streamline labor-intensive tasks, reduce payrolls and speed turnaround times.
Marietti C
Healthc Inform; 1998 Aug; 15(8):65-6, 68-76, 80. PubMed ID: 10182499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The lab's role in developing an institutional drug testing policy.
Harty-Golder B
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Feb; 34(2):22. PubMed ID: 11881272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How to defuse compliance time bombs. Part 2: Six hypothetical allegations. Panel discussion.
Frogale C; McAdams R; Raspanti M; Sheehan J; Ward R
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1999 Jun; 31(6):56-8, 60, 62-8. PubMed ID: 10539659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. Attorneys' Offices investigate outpatient clinical laboratory services.
QRC Advis; 1998 Aug; 14(10):1-4. PubMed ID: 10181888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of clinical laboratory: therapeutic TAT, safety, and medical errors.
Okorodudu AO
Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):300. PubMed ID: 19863929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Don't rush your compliance plan.
Rozovsky FA
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Jan; 23(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 10175812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Top 10 most challenging laboratory standards: tips for future compliance.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(3):12-4. PubMed ID: 10175837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should a lab report defective medical equipment?
Harty-Golder B
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Jan; 34(1):16. PubMed ID: 11828952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Making sense of the federal sentencing guidelines: how health care corporations can manage risk by adopting corporate compliance programs.
Radinsky G
J Health Hosp Law; 1997 Jun; 30(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 10169575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surviving a CLIA inspection.
Weatherhead SK
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Sep; 28(9):26, 30, 32. PubMed ID: 10160195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Top standards compliance issues for 2006.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Feb; 27(2):suppl 4p following 8. PubMed ID: 17432455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The laboratory accreditation and regulations of clinical laboratory in China.
Yang Zh
Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):310. PubMed ID: 19863937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Organization and evolution of the regulation and standards in France for the clinical laboratories.
Gouget B
Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):314. PubMed ID: 19863940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Federal regulation of clinical laboratories. A prospective public policy analysis.
Hammond HC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 3355333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
