246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2130954)
21. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study.
Olmstead FH
Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
Chaput KA
Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
Embree MG; Dobson TA
Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
Jackson CP
Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion--an update.
Guthman HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Legislation on contraception and abortion for adolescents.
Roemer R
Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(5):241-51. PubMed ID: 4060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
Bertuglia J
Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
O'Shaughnessy M
Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Law and life sciences. Abortion and the Supreme Court: round two.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Oct; 6(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 972027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
Ehrlich JS
Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
Allen AL
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
Kudner KE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Fertility-related state laws enacted in 1981.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 7047208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion law today.
Field MA
J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
Farber DA; Nowak JE
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Marital secrets. The emerging issue of abortion spousal notification laws.
Shore BD
J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 6983551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
Hatch OG
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The next abortion decision.
N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
