100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2130995)
1. A study of the effect of introducing a restrictive cervical screening policy on laboratory workload and cervical cancer detection rates.
Channer JL; Mackenzie EF
Cytopathology; 1990; 1(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 2130995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Six years' audit of laboratory workload and rates of referral for colposcopy in a cervical screening programme in three districts.
Raffle AE; Alden B; Mackenzie EF
BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):907-11. PubMed ID: 2261537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study.
Flannelly G; Monaghan J; Cruickshank M; Duncan I; Johnson J; Jordan J; Campbell M; Patnick J
BJOG; 2004 Apr; 111(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 15008774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision analysis for best management of mildly dyskaryotic smear.
Johnson N; Sutton J; Thornton JG; Lilford RJ; Johnson VA; Peel KR
Lancet; 1993 Jul; 342(8863):91-6. PubMed ID: 8100917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An examination of the role of opportunistic smear taking in the NHS cervical screening programme using data from the CSEU cervical screening cohort study.
Blanks RG; Moss SM; Coleman DA; Swerdlow AJ
BJOG; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 17803716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The preparation of additional smears from a cervical scrape: impact on the rate of detection of cervical neoplasia.
Al-Awadhi R; Byrne M; Coleman DV
Cytopathology; 2001 Jun; 12(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 11380556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Williams AR
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of nonscreening smears on screening smear results: a statistical analysis with its implications for the NHS cervical screening programme.
Rice S; Slater DN; Hewer EM
Cytopathology; 2000 Jun; 11(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 10877275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of age stratification for colposcopy referral following initial diagnosis of mild dyskaryosis.
Crowther S; Turner L; Magee D; Gibbons D
J Clin Pathol; 2008 May; 61(5):665-8. PubMed ID: 18227138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a quality control method.
Cross PA
Cytopathology; 1997 Apr; 8(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 9134332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.
Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9162):1381-5. PubMed ID: 10227217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of high grade dyskaryotic cervical smears likely to be missed on rapid rescreening.
O'Sullivan JP; Chapman PA; Jenkins L; Smith R
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10667157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of women with a cervical smear showing a mild degree of dyskaryosis: a review of policy.
Cooper P; Kirby AJ; Spiegelhalter DJ; Whitehead AL; Patterson A
Cytopathology; 1992; 3(6):331-9. PubMed ID: 1486177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for cervical cancer with the human papillomavirus test in an area of central Italy with no previous active cytological screening programme.
Confortini M; Giorgi Rossi P; Barbarino P; Passarelli AM; Orzella L; Tufi MC
J Med Screen; 2010; 17(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 20660436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No increased risk for cervical cancer after a broader definition of a negative Pap smear.
Rebolj M; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade F; Looman C; Boer R; Habbema JD
Int J Cancer; 2008 Dec; 123(11):2632-5. PubMed ID: 18767046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
