These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21310011)
1. Performance of three biometry devices in patients with different grades of age-related cataract. Mylonas G; Sacu S; Buehl W; Ritter M; Georgopoulos M; Schmidt-Erfurth U Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 89(3):e237-41. PubMed ID: 21310011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of 2 new optical biometry devices and comparison with the current gold standard biometer. Chen YA; Hirnschall N; Findl O J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 37(3):513-7. PubMed ID: 21244866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Montés-Micó R; Carones F; Buttacchio A; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D J Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 27(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 21323302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer. Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5. Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound biometry vs. IOL Master. Roy A; Das S; Sahu SK; Rath S Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1937.e1-2. PubMed ID: 22944497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20362858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer. Bjeloš Rončević M; Bušić M; Cima I; Kuzmanović Elabjer B; Bosnar D; Miletić D Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jan; 249(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 20981435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients. Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement of ocular biometry measurements between 2 biometers. Yeu E J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 31279621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry. Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry. Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison between Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometry and OcuScan RXP contact biometry for task delegation]. El Chehab H; Giraud JM; Le Corre A; Chave N; Durand F; Kuter S; Ract-Madoux G; Swalduz B; Mourgues G; Dot C J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Mar; 34(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 21257228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer. Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]