These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21310210)

  • 1. Preventing distraction: assessing stimulus-specific and general effects of the predictive cueing of deviant auditory events.
    Horváth J; Sussman E; Winkler I; Schröger E
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Apr; 87(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 21310210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preventing distraction by probabilistic cueing.
    Horváth J; Bendixen A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 22178734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When sound and picture do not fit: Mismatch negativity and sensory interaction.
    Ullsperger P; Erdmann U; Freude G; Dehoff W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16290115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing.
    Mittag M; Takegata R; Winkler I
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(37):9572-9. PubMed ID: 27629709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge of sequence structure prevents auditory distraction: an ERP study.
    Volosin M; Horváth J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jun; 92(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 24657900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.
    Escera C; Alho K; Winkler I; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Sep; 10(5):590-604. PubMed ID: 9802992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.
    Max C; Widmann A; Schröger E; Sussman E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Nov; 98(2 Pt 1):174-81. PubMed ID: 26386396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
    Munka L; Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices.
    Berti S; Schröger E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Jan; 10(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 11167050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.
    Li B; Parmentier FB; Zhang M
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 23628699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Context effects on auditory distraction.
    Chen S; Sussman ES
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Oct; 94(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 23886958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioral and evoked potential measures of distraction in 5-year-old children born preterm.
    Mikkola K; Wetzel N; Leipälä J; Serenius-Sirve S; Schröger E; Huotilainen M; Fellman V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 20362015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?
    Horváth J; Winkler I; Bendixen A
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18468765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants.
    Jankowiak S; Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 17241142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.