These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21310386)
1. Intraocular pressure measurements and biomechanical properties of the cornea in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Fabian ID; Barequet IS; Skaat A; Rechtman E; Goldenfeld M; Roberts CJ; Melamed S Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 151(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 21310386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty. Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology. Browning AC; Bhan A; Rotchford AP; Shah S; Dua HS Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 88(11):1395-9. PubMed ID: 15489480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model. Neuburger M; Maier P; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; F Jordan J J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep; 22(7):584-90. PubMed ID: 22366704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraocular pressure values obtained by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, and goldmann tonometry in keratokonic corneas. Bayer A; Sahin A; Hürmeriç V; Ozge G J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(8):540-5. PubMed ID: 20164793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the NCT Reichert R7 with Goldmann applanation tonometry and the Reichert ocular response analyzer. Jorge J; González-Méijome JM; Queirós A; Fernandes P; Diaz-Rey JA Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Mar; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 21309804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of different keratoplasty techniques on the biomechanical properties of the cornea. Abdelkader A Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 91(7):e567-72. PubMed ID: 23879240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes. Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with nanophthalmos. Altan C; Kara N; Baz O; Satana B; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 22399691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results. Abd Elaziz MS; Elsobky HM; Zaky AG; Hassan EAM; KhalafAllah MT BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):172. PubMed ID: 31391006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Feizi S; Einollahi B; Yazdani S; Hashemloo A Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 22357385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes]. Deuter CM; Schlote T; Hahn GA; Bende T; Derse M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the ocular response analyzer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Feizi S; Hashemloo A; Rastegarpour A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5887-91. PubMed ID: 21447674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurements of intraocular pressure by Goldmann tonometry, Tonopen XL, and the transpalpebral tonometer, TGDc-01, after penetrating keratoplasty: a comparativye study. Shemesh G; Waisbourd M; Varssano D; Michaeli A; Lazar M; Kurtz S Cornea; 2009 Aug; 28(7):724-7. PubMed ID: 19574919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tonometry in normal and scarred corneas, and in postkeratoplasty eyes: a comparative study of the Goldmann, the ProTon and the Schiotz tonometers. Jain AK; Saini JS; Gupta R Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 48(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11271930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]