These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21310748)

  • 1. Treating women under 36 years old without top-quality embryos on day 2: a prospective study comparing double embryo transfer with single blastocyst transfer.
    Guerif F; Frapsauce C; Chavez C; Cadoret V; Royere D
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 21310748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.
    Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.
    Papanikolaou EG; Camus M; Kolibianakis EM; Van Landuyt L; Van Steirteghem A; Devroey P
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(11):1139-46. PubMed ID: 16540614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
    El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction technology: towards a policy of single blastocyst transfer in younger women.
    Kalu E; Thum MY; Abdalla H
    BJOG; 2008 Aug; 115(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 18518874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques.
    Surrey E; Keller J; Stevens J; Gustofson R; Minjarez D; Schoolcraft W
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Sep; 21(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 20638905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blastocyst stage transfer: the real benefits compared with early embryo transfer.
    Plachot M; Belaisch-Allart J; Mayenga JM; Chouraqui A; Serkine AM; Tesquier L
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15 Suppl 6():24-30. PubMed ID: 11261480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing the multiple pregnancy rate in ART.
    Bowman M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S132-5. PubMed ID: 21213510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of oocyte vitrification combined with blastocyst stage transfer in an egg donation program.
    García JI; Noriega-Portella L; Noriega-Hoces L
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):782-90. PubMed ID: 21303777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2-3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study.
    Levitas E; Lunenfeld E; Har-Vardi I; Albotiano S; Sonin Y; Hackmon-Ram R; Potashnik G
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Mar; 81(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 15037404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes].
    Li Y; Chen ZJ; Yang HJ; Zhong WX; Ma SY; Li M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):753-5. PubMed ID: 18307902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical experience employing co-culture of human embryos with autologous human endometrial epithelial cells.
    Rubio C; Simón C; Mercader A; Garcia-Velasco J; Remohí J; Pellicer A
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15 Suppl 6():31-8. PubMed ID: 11261481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High ongoing pregnancy rates after deferred transfer through bipronuclear oocyte cryopreservation and post-thaw extended culture.
    Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1594-9. PubMed ID: 19006793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single blastocyst embryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer but results in healthier pregnancy outcomes.
    Zander-Fox DL; Tremellen K; Lane M
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Oct; 51(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 21806585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Embryo transfer is equally effective at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage: a randomized prospective study.
    Hreinsson J; Rosenlund B; Fridström M; Ek I; Levkov L; Sjöblom P; Hovatta O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 15541857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers.
    Van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Kester AD; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):2103-8. PubMed ID: 15243008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
    Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Racowsky C; Surrey ES;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18222441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cryopreservation in blastocyst stage effectively reduce the number of embryos cryopreserved].
    Schwarze JE; Balmaceda J; Pommer R
    Rev Med Chil; 2012 Jan; 140(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 22552554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blastocyst embryo transfer is the primary determinant for improved outcomes in oocyte donation cycles.
    Porat N; Boehnlein LM; Barker MA; Kovacs P; Lindheim SR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Apr; 36(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 20492388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.