These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2131082)

  • 21. Do medical student research subjects need special protection?
    Christakis N
    IRB; 1985; 7(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vulnerable persons in biomedical research: 50 years after the Nuremberg Code.
    Dickens BM
    J Int Bioethique; 1999; 10(1-2):13-23. PubMed ID: 11806429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ethical issues regarding research on prisoners.
    Arboleda-Flórez J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1991 Mar; 35(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11653968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sharing scientific data II: normative issues.
    Weil V; Hollander R
    IRB; 1990; 12(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. New draft code for research involving humans proved a major challenge.
    Baer N
    CMAJ; 1996 Aug; 155(4):442-4. PubMed ID: 8752068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
    Reiser SJ; Knudson P
    IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
    Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
    J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
    Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
    van Eys J; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Safeguarding human rights in medical experiments.
    WHO Chron; 1979 Sep; 33(9):326-8. PubMed ID: 532129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Health science research ethics: a critique.
    Coburn D
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Caregivers as subjects of clinical drug trials: a review of human subjects protection practices in published studies of Alzheimer's disease pharmacotherapies.
    Lingler JH; Parker LS; DeKosky ST; Schulz R
    IRB; 2006; 28(3):11-8. PubMed ID: 17036439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations.
    Gray BH
    IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Asking the sensitive question: the ethics of survey research and teen sex.
    Phillips SR
    IRB; 1994; 16(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11659989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How not to rethink research ethics.
    Beauchamp TL
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Medical experimentation and the protection of human rights.
    World Federation of Associations of Clinical Toxicology Centers and Poison Control Centers
    Bull Med Leg Toxicol; 1979; 22(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 11661830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS.
    Bayer R; Levine C; Murray TH
    IRB; 1984; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Structuring the review of human genetics protocols, Part II: diagnostic and screening studies.
    Glass KC; Weijer C; Lemmens T; Palmour RM; Shapiro SH
    IRB; 1997; 19(3-4):1-13. PubMed ID: 11656943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The New Zealand Cot Death Study: some legal and ethical issues.
    Mitchell EA; Hassall IB; Scragg R; Taylor BJ; Ford R; Allen EM
    J Paediatr Child Health; 1992; 28 Supp 1():S17-20. PubMed ID: 11686168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.