These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2131088)

  • 1. Maternal-fetal conflict: a study of physician concerns in court-ordered cesarean sections.
    Elkins TE; Brown D; Barclay M; Andersen HF
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 2131088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Court-ordered treatment in obstetrics: the ethical views and legal framework.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 79(3):476-7; author reply 478-9. PubMed ID: 1738534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mothers and doctors' orders: unmasking the doctor's fiduciary role in maternal-fetal conflicts.
    Oberman M
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2000; 94(2):451-501. PubMed ID: 12455556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective.
    Doukas DJ; Elkins TE
    Prim Care; 1993 Sep; 20(3):721-8. PubMed ID: 8378462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of the ACOG and AAP ethics statements on conflicts in maternal-fetal care.
    Brown D; Andersen HF; Elkins TE
    J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(1):19-22; discussion 23-4. PubMed ID: 1932792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court-ordered cesarean section: an analysis of ethical concerns in compelling cases.
    Elkins TE; Andersen HF; Barclay M; Mason T; Bowdler N; Anderson G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 161(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 2750796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ethical justification for emergency, coerced cesarean delivery.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Skupski DW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):1029-35. PubMed ID: 8233254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When refusing treatment jeopardizes another life.
    Levine J; Nolan K; Rhoden NK; Salladay SA
    Nursing; 1988 May; 18(5):145-7. PubMed ID: 3362449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Justified limits on refusing intervention.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(2):12-8. PubMed ID: 2045276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court-ordered treatment in obstetrics: the ethical views and legal framework.
    Strong C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):861-8. PubMed ID: 1923212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):302-5. PubMed ID: 8559543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Court ordered obstetric intervention: a commentary.
    Brenner B; Burnet P
    N Z Med J; 1995 Oct; 108(1010):431-2. PubMed ID: 7478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.
    Noble-Allgire AM
    J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical analysis of the intrapartum management of pregnancy complicated by fetal hydrocephalus with macrocephaly.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 3763090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compelling treatment of the mother to protect the fetus: the limits of personal privacy and paternalism.
    Obade CC
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 2131065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal therapy and surgery. Fetal rights versus maternal obligations.
    Rosner F; Bennett AJ; Cassell EJ; Farnsworth PB; Landolt AB; Loeb L; Numann PJ; Ona FV; Risemberg HM; Sechzer PH
    N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 2710438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. C-section for organ donation.
    Berkowitz ST; Newman LE; Mathieu DR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(2):22; discussion 22-4. PubMed ID: 2318622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
    Cahill H
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case for a middle ground.
    Elkins TE
    Womens Health Issues; 1990; 1(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 2136300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal versus maternal rights: medical and legal perspectives.
    Bowes WA; Selgestad B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Aug; 58(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 7254733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.