These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Signal Dependence on Irradiation Geometry of Cd1-xZnxTe Detectors for Digital X-Ray Imaging. Giakos GC; Vedantham S; Pillai B; Chowdhury S; Sheffer DB; Dasgupta A; Endorf RJ; Passalaqua A; Kollipara S J Xray Sci Technol; 1997 Jan; 7(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 21311126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and Electrical Properties of Cd1-xZnxTe Detectors at Elevated Temperatures. Egarievwe SU; Chen KT; Burger A; James RB; Lisse CM J Xray Sci Technol; 1996 Jan; 6(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 21307531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electric Field Dependence on Charge Collection of CdZnTe X-Ray Detectors. Giakos GC; Pillai B; Vedantham S; Chowdhuri S; Odogba J; Dasgupta A; Vega-Lozada V; Guntupalli R; Suryanarayanan S; Endorf RJ; Passalaqua A; Kollipara S J Xray Sci Technol; 1997 Jan; 7(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 21307550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of photon-counting based K-edge imaging in X-ray computed tomography. Roessl E; Brendel B; Engel KJ; Schlomka JP; Thran A; Proksa R IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1678-90. PubMed ID: 21507770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography. Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity study of proton radiography and comparison with kV and MV x-ray imaging using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations. Depauw N; Seco J Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2407-21. PubMed ID: 21427482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors. Marshall NW; Mackenzie A; Honey ID Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography. Doyle P; Martin CJ Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems. Fetterly KA; Schueler BA Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pixelwise fusion for optimizing SNR in multiple-plate computed radiography imaging. Wang T; Shaw CC; Li CC IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Mar; 18(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 10363702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Monte Carlo-based model for simulation of digital chest tomosynthesis. Ullman G; Dance DR; Sandborg M; Carlsson GA; Svalkvist A; Båth M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):159-63. PubMed ID: 20203125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the chest wall thickness of the lawrence livermore torso phantom using a voxel image. Ahmed AS; Capello K; Kramer GH Health Phys; 2011 Jun; 100(6):574-82. PubMed ID: 22004927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system. Zhang D; Liu H; Wu X Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]