BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21311399)

  • 1. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008.
    Rajaee SS; Bae HW; Kanim LE; Delamarter RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 21311399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in the utilization of spinal fusion in the United States.
    Cowan JA; Dimick JB; Wainess R; Upchurch GR; Chandler WF; La Marca F
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Jul; 59(1):15-20; discussion 15-20. PubMed ID: 16823295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidemiological trends in the utilization of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal fusions from 2002 to 2011.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 24365905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures.
    Marawar S; Girardi FP; Sama AA; Ma Y; Gaber-Baylis LK; Besculides MC; Memtsoudis SG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1454-9. PubMed ID: 20216341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-hospital complications and mortality after elective spinal fusion surgery in the united states: a study of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2005.
    Shen Y; Silverstein JC; Roth S
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jan; 21(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 19098620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: current state and trends in treatment for cervical disc pathology.
    Nesterenko SO; Riley LH; Skolasky RL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):1470-4. PubMed ID: 22343278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bae HW; Rajaee SS; Kanim LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):916-26. PubMed ID: 23324922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in the treatment of lumbar spine fractures in the United States: a socioeconomics perspective: clinical article.
    Baaj AA; Downes K; Vaccaro AR; Uribe JS; Vale FL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 21740124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National in-hospital morbidity and mortality trends after lumbar fusion surgery between 1998 and 2008.
    Pumberger M; Chiu YL; Ma Y; Girardi FP; Mazumdar M; Memtsoudis SG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 22371544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in the utilization of blood transfusions in spinal fusion in the United States from 2000 to 2009.
    Yoshihara H; Yoneoka D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 24253791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morbid obesity increases cost and complication rates in spinal arthrodesis.
    Kalanithi PA; Arrigo R; Boakye M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(11):982-8. PubMed ID: 22037526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment.
    Polly DW; Glassman SD; Schwender JD; Shaffrey CI; Branch C; Burkus JK; Gornet MF;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11 Suppl):S20-6. PubMed ID: 17495582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York.
    Carey JS; Danielsen B; Gold JP; Rossiter SJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1276-82. PubMed ID: 15942567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Narrowing the gap: early and intermediate outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft procedures in California, 1997 to 2006.
    Carey JS; Danielsen B; Milliken J; Li Z; Stabile BE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1100-7. PubMed ID: 19837215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.
    Browne JA; Cook C; Pietrobon R; Bethel MA; Richardson WJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(20):2214-9. PubMed ID: 17873813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What will anesthesiologists be anesthetizing? Trends in neurosurgical procedure usage.
    Hughey AB; Lesniak MS; Ansari SA; Roth S
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Jun; 110(6):1686-97. PubMed ID: 20142356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association.
    Allareddy V; Allareddy V; Konety BR
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 17592302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States.
    Wang MC; Chan L; Maiman DJ; Kreuter W; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 17268266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery: a national database analysis between 2002 and 2011.
    Marquez-Lara A; Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 24365907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.