These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2131158)

  • 1. [The beauty perspective of the horizontal lip position].
    Hsu BS; Kuang SH
    Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1990 Mar; 9(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 2131158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of the five analytic reference lines of the horizontal lip position: their consistency and sensitivity.
    Hsu BS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Oct; 104(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 8213657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses.
    Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM; Erbay SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 11786873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can commonly used profile planes be used to evaluate changes in lower lip position?
    Buschang PH; Fretty K; Campbell PM
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):557-63. PubMed ID: 21299383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of analytical reference lines for determining esthetically pleasing lip position: An assessment of consistency, sensitivity, and specificity.
    Ng JHH; Singh P; Wang Z; Yang Y; Khambay BS; Gu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):e14-e26. PubMed ID: 37227323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of Horizontal Lip Position With Ricketts Esthetic Plane in Preschool and School-Going Children of Bankura, West Bengal: A Craniofacial Anthropometric Study.
    Ahuja A; Ahuja V; Verma J; Arunima A; Thosar NR
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e55015. PubMed ID: 38550482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying Sagittal Lip Changes in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip Post Abbe Flap Reconstruction.
    Muller JN; Diaz A; Verzella A; Staffenberg DA; Flores RL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Jun; ():10556656241255478. PubMed ID: 38835231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population.
    Sushner NI
    Am J Orthod; 1977 Oct; 72(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 269666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is it possible to define the ideal lips?
    Kar M; Muluk NB; Bafaqeeh SA; Cingi C
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2018 Feb; 38(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 29756617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging.
    Hier LA; Evans CA; BeGole EA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10371428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of facial aesthetics in young population with beautiful faces in Nanchang city].
    Qu J; Lu X; Ge HS; Liu WJ; Zhi Q; Wang DK
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Oct; 23(5):586-9. PubMed ID: 25543603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Ideal Dimensions of the Ears, Nose, and Lip in the Circles of Prominence Theory on Facial Beauty.
    Young P
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2019 May; 21(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 30763411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial profile-esthetics and acceptance.
    Bhatia AF
    Indian J Dent Res; 1989; 1(2-3):45-53. PubMed ID: 2490120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A cephalometric comparison of skeletal profile and soft tissue profile on adults with normal occlusion].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 2101666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentoskeletal determinants of soft tissue morphology.
    Saxby PJ; Freer TJ
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Apr; 55(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 3860026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attractive Versus Golden Ratios: Formula of Utopian Beauty through Comparison of Facial Proportions among Worldwide Celebrities and Average People.
    Yalcinkaya E; Kocaman SA; Yuksekkaya M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1950-1955. PubMed ID: 35119402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.