These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21312087)

  • 1. [The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].
    Labenz J; Kunz CU
    Urologe A; 2011 Feb; 50(2):233-43; quiz 244. PubMed ID: 21312087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [ The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].
    Labenz J; Kunz CJ
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 Jan; 108(1):73-83; quiz 84. PubMed ID: 21253744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].
    Labenz J; Kunz CU
    Anaesthesist; 2011 Jan; 60(1):79-89; quiz 90. PubMed ID: 21264653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].
    Labenz J; Kunz CU
    Internist (Berl); 2010 Apr; 51(4):489-99; quiz 500. PubMed ID: 20221576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two new covariate adjustment methods for non-inferiority assessment of binary clinical trials data.
    Hou Y; Ding V; Li K; Zhou XH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 21191856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
    Jaillon P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [ The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials ].
    Labenz J; Kunz CU
    Radiologe; 2011 Jan; 51(1):65-75; quiz 76. PubMed ID: 21243463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on the conservativeness of the confidence interval approach for the selection of non-inferiority margin in the two-arm active-control trial.
    Sankoh AJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3732-42. PubMed ID: 18407575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength of evidence of non-inferiority trials-The adjustment of the type I error rate in non-inferiority trials with the synthesis method.
    Kang SH; Tsong Y
    Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1477-87. PubMed ID: 20535762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Issues on the selection of non-inferiority margin in clinical trials.
    Hou Y; Wu XY; Li K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):466-70. PubMed ID: 19302756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of non-compliance on intent-to-treat analysis of equivalence trials.
    Sheng D; Kim MY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1183-99. PubMed ID: 16220491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
    Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of futility in clinical trials.
    Snapinn S; Chen MG; Jiang Q; Koutsoukos T
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 17128426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating co-primary endpoints collectively in clinical trials.
    Li QH
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 19219905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Statistical notes. From superiority to non-inferiority clinical trials: a leap in the dark?].
    Marubini E; Rebora P; Reina G
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Sep; 5(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 15568609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new and rapid scoring system to assess the scientific evidence from clinical trials.
    Silber S
    J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 19(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17107362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.