443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21314084)
1. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.
Chaiyongsirisern A; Rabie AB; Wong RW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
Alves PF; Oliveira AG
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
Meibodi SE; Meybodi SA; Meybodi EM
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances.
McGuinness NJ; Burden DJ; Hunt OT; Johnston CD; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 21392692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes.
Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 21411476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Post-treatment evaluation of a magnetic activator device in Class II high-angle malocclusions.
Yüksel S; Kaygisiz E; Ulusoy C; Keykubat A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 20053717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Pilot Study on the Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of Two Functional Appliances in Class II, Division 1 Growing Children.
Chen H; Yagi K; Almeida FR; Pliska BT; Lowe AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 26349284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
Das UM; Reddy D
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
