These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21315069)

  • 21. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01 with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Waisbourd M; Shemesh G; Top LB; Lazar M; Loewenstein A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):902-6. PubMed ID: 20306444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intraocular pressure measurement in cynomolgus monkeys. Tono-Pen versus manometry.
    Peterson JA; Kiland JA; Croft MA; Kaufman PL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 May; 37(6):1197-9. PubMed ID: 8631634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Goldmann and error correcting tonometry prisms compared to intracameral pressure.
    McCafferty S; Levine J; Schwiegerling J; Enikov ET
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 29301514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
    Pereira FQ; Bercht BS; Soares MG; da Mota MG; Pigatto JA
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 14(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 21929609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo.
    McCafferty S; Levine J; Schwiegerling J; Enikov ET
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):215. PubMed ID: 29178849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.
    Bhan A; Browning AC; Shah S; Hamilton R; Dave D; Dua HS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1389-92. PubMed ID: 11980851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness.
    Poostchi A; Mitchell R; Nicholas S; Purdie G; Wells A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 37(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19788665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry.
    Cannizzo SA; Lewbart GA; Westermeyer HD
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 20(6):526-532. PubMed ID: 28247466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of rebound tonometry in red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans).
    Delgado C; Mans C; McLellan GJ; Bentley E; Sladky KK; Miller PE
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 17(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 25097909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of two rebound tonometers in healthy horses.
    Mustikka MP; Pietilä EM; Mykkänen AK; Grönthal TSC
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2020 Sep; 23(5):892-898. PubMed ID: 32888242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rebound tonometer: ideal tonometer for measurement of accurate intraocular pressure.
    Suman S; Agrawal A; Pal VK; Pratap VB
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec; 23(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 23429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
    Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.