These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21315205)

  • 1. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: Is it worth the wait? The risk-time relationship and the need to quantify the impact of delay.
    Tarantini G; Van de Werf F; Bilato C; Gersh B
    Am Heart J; 2011 Feb; 161(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 21315205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous coronary intervention-related time delay, patient's risk profile, and survival benefits of primary angioplasty vs lytic therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    De Luca G; Cassetti E; Marino P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 27(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 19751630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).
    Danchin N; Coste P; Ferrières J; Steg PG; Cottin Y; Blanchard D; Belle L; Ritz B; Kirkorian G; Angioi M; Sans P; Charbonnier B; Eltchaninoff H; Guéret P; Khalife K; Asseman P; Puel J; Goldstein P; Cambou JP; Simon T;
    Circulation; 2008 Jul; 118(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 18591434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients.
    Boersma E;
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Apr; 27(7):779-88. PubMed ID: 16513663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptable reperfusion delay to prefer primary angioplasty over fibrin-specific thrombolytic therapy is affected (mainly) by the patient's mortality risk: 1 h does not fit all.
    Tarantini G; Razzolini R; Napodano M; Bilato C; Ramondo A; Iliceto S
    Eur Heart J; 2010 Mar; 31(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 19946106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital delays in reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: implications when selecting a reperfusion strategy.
    Pinto DS; Kirtane AJ; Nallamothu BK; Murphy SA; Cohen DJ; Laham RJ; Cutlip DE; Bates ER; Frederick PD; Miller DP; Carrozza JP; Antman EM; Cannon CP; Gibson CM
    Circulation; 2006 Nov; 114(19):2019-25. PubMed ID: 17075010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mortality benefit of immediate thrombolytic therapy versus delayed primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
    Kent DM; Ruthazer R; Griffith JL; Beshansky JR; Grines CL; Aversano T; Concannon TW; Zalenski RJ; Selker HP
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 May; 99(10):1384-8. PubMed ID: 17493465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary PCI as the preferred reperfusion therapy in STEMI: it is a matter of time.
    Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Sørensen JT; Kristensen SD; Lassen JF; Thuesen L; Andersen HR; Vach W; Nielsen TT
    Heart; 2009 Mar; 95(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 19218262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Dunning J; Thornley AR; Sutton AG; Muir DF; Wright RA; Hall JA; de Belder MA
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 May; 19(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 17476036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of reperfusion delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.
    Blankenship JC; Skelding KA; Scott TD; Berger PB; Parise H; Brodie BR; Witzenbichler B; Gaugliumi G; Peruga JZ; Lansky AJ; Mehran R; Stone GW
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Dec; 106(11):1527-33. PubMed ID: 21094350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous coronary intervention following thrombolysis: for whom and when?
    Taglieri N; Di Mario C
    Acute Card Care; 2009; 11(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 19995260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term prognostic value of ST-segment resolution in patients treated with fibrinolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention results from the DANAMI-2 (DANish trial in acute myocardial infarction-2).
    Sejersten M; Valeur N; Grande P; Nielsen TT; Clemmensen P;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(19):1763-9. PubMed ID: 19874989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieving routine sub 30 minute door-to-balloon times in a high volume 24/7 primary angioplasty center with autonomous ambulance diagnosis and immediate catheter laboratory access.
    Dalby M; Kharbanda R; Ghimire G; Spiro J; Moore P; Roughton M; Lane R; Al-Obaidi M; Teoh M; Hutchison E; Whitbread M; Fountain D; Grocott-Mason R; Mitchell A; Mason M; Ilsley C
    Am Heart J; 2009 Nov; 158(5):829-35. PubMed ID: 19853705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a comprehensive review of contemporary management options.
    Boden WE; Eagle K; Granger CB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 50(10):917-29. PubMed ID: 17765117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Call 911" STEMI protocol to reduce delays in transfer of patients from non primary percutaneous coronary intervention referral Centers.
    Baruch T; Rock A; Koenig WJ; Rokos I; French WJ
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2010 Sep; 9(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 20802263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field triage reduces treatment delay and improves long-term clinical outcome in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Pedersen SH; Galatius S; Hansen PR; Mogelvang R; Abildstrom SZ; Sørensen R; Davidsen U; Galloe A; Abildgaard U; Iversen A; Bech J; Madsen JK; Jensen JS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):2296-302. PubMed ID: 19958965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.
    Coleman CI; McKay RG; Boden WE; Mather JF; White CM
    Clin Ther; 2006 Jul; 28(7):1054-62. PubMed ID: 16990084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the time to reperfusion on early outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty.
    Trzos E; Kurpesa M; Bednarkiewicz Z; Peruga J; Kasprzak J; Plewka M; Uznańska B; Krzemińska-Pakuła M
    Kardiol Pol; 2007 Nov; 65(11):1296-304; discussion 1305-6. PubMed ID: 18058580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction for mechanical reperfusion: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials.
    De Luca G; Biondi-Zoccai G; Marino P
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 52(6):665-76. PubMed ID: 19027496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation between hospital specialization with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4 analysis.
    Nallamothu BK; Wang Y; Magid DJ; McNamara RL; Herrin J; Bradley EH; Bates ER; Pollack CV; Krumholz HM;
    Circulation; 2006 Jan; 113(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 16401769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.