These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21316094)

  • 1. Clavien classification of complications after 150 laparoscopic pyeloplasties.
    Szydełko T; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Tupikowski K; Pupka A; Janczak D; Zdrojowy R
    Urology; 2011 Jun; 77(6):1359-64. PubMed ID: 21316094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a center surgeon's experience involving 601 procedures including the learning curve.
    Akin Y; Ates M; Celik O; Ucar M; Yucel S; Erdogru T
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2013 May; 29(5):275-9. PubMed ID: 23639515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns and predictors of laparoscopic complications in pediatric urology: the role of ongoing surgical volume and access techniques.
    Passerotti CC; Nguyen HT; Retik AB; Peters CA
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):681-5. PubMed ID: 18554647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations.
    Mitropoulos D; Artibani W; Graefen M; Remzi M; Rouprêt M; Truss M;
    Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 22074761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relaparoscopy in the treatment of complications after laparoscopic urological procedures.
    Vitagliano G; Castilla R; Fernandez Long JG
    Arch Esp Urol; 2013 Mar; 66(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 23589599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver variability of Clavien-Dindo scoring in urology.
    Poletajew S; Zapała L; Piotrowicz S; Wołyniec P; Sochaj M; Buraczyński P; Lisiński J; Swiniarski P; Radziszewski P;
    Int J Urol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1274-8. PubMed ID: 25039893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Laparoscopic pyeloplasty].
    Valdivia Uría JG; Sánchez Elipe MA; Sánchez Zalabardo M
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):679-86. PubMed ID: 12224166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications of 2,775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005.
    Permpongkosol S; Link RE; Su LM; Romero FR; Bagga HS; Pavlovich CP; Jarrett TW; Kavoussi LR
    J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):580-5. PubMed ID: 17222637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Clavien-Dindo classification in reporting and grading complications after urological surgical procedures: analysis of 2010 to 2012.
    Yoon PD; Chalasani V; Woo HH
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1271-4. PubMed ID: 23583859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications in laparoscopic urology.
    Burchardt M; Stolzenburg JU
    World J Urol; 2008 Dec; 26(6):521-2. PubMed ID: 18989676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): solving the technical difficulties.
    Bachmann A; Ruszat R; Forster T; Eberli D; Zimmermann M; Müller A; Gasser TC; Sulser T; Wyler S
    Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 16439056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: our experience.
    Qadri SJ; Khan M
    Urol Int; 2010; 85(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 20664193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Cheema IA; Manecksha RP; Flynn R
    Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 20222392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty.
    Tracy CR; Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA
    Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1029-34. PubMed ID: 19660793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ureteric stents in pyeloplasty: a help or a hindrance?
    Elmalik K; Chowdhury MM; Capps SN
    J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Aug; 4(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 18644529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of laparoscopic stone surgery.
    Desai RA; Assimos DG
    Urology; 2008 Apr; 71(4):578-80. PubMed ID: 18387386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 1316 elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures.
    Kirchhoff P; Dincler S; Buchmann P
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 18650636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.