These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2131673)

  • 1. [Quantification of mechanical versus ultrasonic technique in root canal preparation].
    Teodorović N; Ivanović V; Filipović V
    Stomatol Glas Srb; 1990 Jun; 37(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 2131673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentin removal efficiency of six endodontic systems: a quantitative comparison.
    Hennequin M; Andre JF; Botta G
    J Endod; 1992 Dec; 18(12):601-4. PubMed ID: 1298799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The use of ultrasonic files in canal preparation].
    Calas P; Terrie B
    Endodoncia; 1990; 8(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 2168733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
    Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer.
    Kosti E; Lambrianidis T; Economides N; Neofitou C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 16409328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mechanical characteristics of ultrasonic device for root canal treatment].
    Hata H
    Kanagawa Shigaku; 1989 Mar; 23(4):587-97. PubMed ID: 2637372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth.
    Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R
    J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):593-6. PubMed ID: 16104971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of precurving on the performance of endosonic K files.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD
    J Endod; 1992 May; 18(5):232-6. PubMed ID: 1402578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
    Beer R; Gängler P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature.
    van der Sluis LW; Versluis M; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):415-26. PubMed ID: 17442017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
    Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.