212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21316887)
21. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose between prospective triggering and retrospective gated coronary angiography by dual-source computed tomography.
Lu B; Lu JG; Sun ML; Hou ZH; Chen XB; Tang X; Wu RZ; Johnson L; Qiao SB; Yang YJ; Jiang SL
Am J Cardiol; 2011 May; 107(9):1278-84. PubMed ID: 21497209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose.
Menke J; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Staab W; Sohns JM; Seif Amir Hosseini A; Schwarz A
Am Heart J; 2013 Feb; 165(2):154-63.e3. PubMed ID: 23351817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose modulated retrospective ECG-gated versus non-gated 64-row CT angiography of the aorta at the same radiation dose: comparison of motion artifacts, diagnostic confidence and signal-to-noise-ratios.
Schernthaner RE; Stadler A; Beitzke D; Homolka P; Weber M; Lammer J; Czerny M; Loewe C
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e585-90. PubMed ID: 21820829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated vs. retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using 128-slice MDCT patients with chest pain: diagnostic performance and radiation dose.
Kim JS; Choo KS; Jeong DW; Chun KJ; Park YH; Song SG; Park JH; Kim JH; Kim J; Han D; Lim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Oct; 52(8):860-5. PubMed ID: 21873509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row multidetector CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-gating combined with fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of coronary artery bypass: evaluation of dose reduction and image quality.
Ippolito D; Fior D; Franzesi CT; Riva L; Casiraghi A; Sironi S
Radiol Med; 2017 Dec; 122(12):893-901. PubMed ID: 28849537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combining Coronary with Carotid and Cerebrovascular Angiography Using Prospective ECG Gating and Iterative Reconstruction with 256-slice CT.
Zhang JL; Liu BL; Zhao YM; Liang HW; Wang GK; Wan Y; Huang YH; Shen BZ
Echocardiography; 2015 Aug; 32(8):1291-8. PubMed ID: 25371093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contrast material and radiation dose reduction strategy for triple-rule-out cardiac CT angiography: feasibility study of non-ECG-gated low kVp scan of the whole chest following coronary CT angiography.
Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Nakamura S; Namimoto T; Nozaki T; Sakaino N; Harada K; Yamashita Y
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1186-96. PubMed ID: 24311703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.
Maruyama T; Takada M; Hasuike T; Yoshikawa A; Namimatsu E; Yoshizumi T
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 52(18):1450-5. PubMed ID: 19017511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reduction of the estimated radiation dose and associated patient risk with prospective ECG-gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography.
Efstathopoulos EP; Kelekis NL; Pantos I; Brountzos E; Argentos S; Grebác J; Ziaka D; Katritsis DG; Seimenis I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(17):5209-22. PubMed ID: 19671974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience.
Gutstein A; Wolak A; Lee C; Dey D; Ohba M; Suzuki Y; Cheng V; Gransar H; Suzuki S; Friedman J; Thomson LE; Hayes S; Pimentel R; Paz W; Slomka P; Berman DS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2008; 2(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 19083926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
Shuman WP; Branch KR; May JM; Mitsumori LM; Lockhart DW; Dubinsky TJ; Warren BH; Caldwell JH
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 18552312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Image Quality of Prospectively ECG-Triggered Coronary CT Angiography in Heart Transplant Recipients.
Bartykowszki A; Kolossváry M; Jermendy ÁL; Karády J; Szilveszter B; Károlyi M; Balogh O; Sax B; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):314-319. PubMed ID: 29091000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Low-dose, prospective triggered high-pitch spiral coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with retrospective spiral technique.
Srichai MB; Lim RP; Donnino R; Mannelli L; Hiralal R; Avery R; Ho C; Babb JS; Jacobs JE
Acad Radiol; 2012 May; 19(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 22366557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient radiation doses in cardiac computed tomography: comparison of published results with prospective and retrospective acquisition.
Efstathopoulos EP; Pantos I; Thalassinou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL; Zografos T; Panayiotakis G; Katritsis DG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 21324959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Jeong DW; Choo KS; Baik SK; Kim YW; Jeon UB; Kim JS; Lim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. New scanning technique using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) significantly reduced the radiation dose of cardiac CT.
Tumur O; Soon K; Brown F; Mykytowycz M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 57(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 23721137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating.
Husmann L; Herzog BA; Gaemperli O; Tatsugami F; Burkhard N; Valenta I; Veit-Haibach P; Wyss CA; Landmesser U; Kaufmann PA
Eur Heart J; 2009 Mar; 30(5):600-7. PubMed ID: 19106197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CT angiography of neonates and infants: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of target mode prospectively ECG-gated 320-MDCT and ungated helical 64-MDCT.
Jadhav SP; Golriz F; Atweh LA; Zhang W; Krishnamurthy R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):W184-91. PubMed ID: 25615779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective ECG-triggered axial CT at 140-kV tube voltage improves coronary in-stent restenosis visibility at a lower radiation dose compared with conventional retrospective ECG-gated helical CT.
Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Kitagawa T; Kohno S; Ito K
Eur Radiol; 2009 Oct; 19(10):2363-72. PubMed ID: 19430797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
