695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21316989)
1. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure and mortality after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer.
Servoll E; Saeter T; Vlatkovic L; Lund T; Nesland J; Waaler G; Axcrona K; Beisland HO
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1489-94. PubMed ID: 21933333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma.
Rasiah KK; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner JJ; Golovsky D; Brenner PC; Kooner R; O'Neill GF; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Henshall SM
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(12):2560-5. PubMed ID: 14669274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in distribution and prognostic significance of Gleason grades on radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens between 1989 and 2001.
Sengupta S; Slezak JM; Blute ML; Leibovich BC; Sebo TJ; Myers RP; Cheville JC; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2630-5. PubMed ID: 16703592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Iocca A; Scherer B; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 11125379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Existence of pattern 5 on radical prostatectomy: poor prognostic factor associated with a lower biochemical recurrence-free survival].
Pastori J; Balssa L; Lillaz J; Guichard G; Chabannes E; Bernardini S; Bittard H; Thiery-Vuillemin A; Kleinclauss F
Prog Urol; 2014 Jun; 24(7):433-40. PubMed ID: 24861683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic influence of the third Gleason grade in prostatectomy specimens.
Cedeño Díaz OM; Fernández Aceñero MJ; Alvarez Fernández E
Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 21292510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kryvenko ON; Gupta NS; Virani N; Schultz D; Gomez J; Amin A; Lane Z; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 23627451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
