199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2131856)
1. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation.
Spahn DR; Schmid ER; Tornic M; Jenni R; von Segesser L; Turina M; Baetscher A
J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Feb; 4(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 2131856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of a new generation transesophageal Doppler device for cardiac output monitoring.
Schmid ER; Spahn DR; Tornic M
Anesth Analg; 1993 Nov; 77(5):971-9. PubMed ID: 8214736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cardiac output measurement techniques: thermodilution, Doppler, CO2-rebreathing and the direct Fick method.
Espersen K; Jensen EW; Rosenborg D; Thomsen JK; Eliasen K; Olsen NV; Kanstrup IL
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1995 Feb; 39(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 7793193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients.
Axler O; Tousignant C; Thompson CR; Dall'ava-Santucci J; Phang PT; Russell JA; Walley KR
J Crit Care; 1996 Sep; 11(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 8891961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Ahola T; Turjanmaa VM
Intensive Care Med; 1997 Nov; 23(11):1132-7. PubMed ID: 9434918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bioimpedance and thermodilution methods for determining cardiac output: experimental and clinical studies.
Spinale FG; Reines HD; Crawford FA
Ann Thorac Surg; 1988 Apr; 45(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3355284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive cardiac output: simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution.
Wong DH; Tremper KK; Stemmer EA; O'Connor D; Wilbur S; Zaccari J; Reeves C; Weidoff P; Trujillo RJ
Anesthesiology; 1990 May; 72(5):784-92. PubMed ID: 2187376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac index quantification by Doppler ultrasound in patients without left ventricular outflow tract abnormalities.
Evangelista A; Garcia-Dorado D; Garcia del Castillo H; Gonzalez-Alujas T; Soler-Soler J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 25(3):710-6. PubMed ID: 7860918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doppler cardiac output and left ventricular performance after cardiac surgery. Pulsed Doppler ascending aorta and pulmonary blood flows and left ventricular function using implanted microprobes.
Fratacci MD; Payen D; Beloucif S; Laborde F
Chest; 1992 Aug; 102(2):380-6. PubMed ID: 1643918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of cardiac output measurements with noninvasive Doppler echocardiography by thermodilution and Fick methods in newborn piglets.
Welch E; Duara S; Suguihara C; Bandstra E; Bancalari E
Biol Neonate; 1994; 66(2-3):137-45. PubMed ID: 7993947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring by aortic blood flow determination: evaluation of the Sometec Dynemo-3000 system.
Cariou A; Monchi M; Joly LM; Bellenfant F; Claessens YE; Thébert D; Brunet F; Dhainaut JF
Crit Care Med; 1998 Dec; 26(12):2066-72. PubMed ID: 9875922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution, thoracic electrical bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound.
Castor G; Klocke RK; Stoll M; Helms J; Niedermark I
Br J Anaesth; 1994 Jan; 72(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 8110539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Methods for Cardiac Output: Intraoperatively Doppler-Derived Cardiac Output Measured With 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Is Not Interchangeable With Cardiac Output by Pulmonary Catheter Thermodilution.
Graeser K; Zemtsovski M; Kofoed KF; Winther-Jensen M; Nilsson JC; Kjaergaard J; Møller-Sørensen H
Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 29324489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Belardinelli R; Ciampani N; Costantini C; Blandini A; Purcaro A
Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jun; 77(15):1293-301. PubMed ID: 8677869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of 2 modified Fick methods and thermodilution for determining the cardiac output in patients with mechanical ventilation].
Corbanese U; Possamai C
Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 May; 61(5):191-9. PubMed ID: 7478050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of cardiac output during exercise. Transthoracic impedance vs. heart rate alone.
Horstmann E; Könn B
Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 8052172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive Doppler-derived cardiac output: a validation study comparing this technique with thermodilution and Fick methods.
Davies JN; Allen DR; Chant AD
Eur J Vasc Surg; 1991 Oct; 5(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 1959678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impedance cardiography. Importance of the equation and the electrode configuration.
van der Meer BJ; Woltjer HH; Sousman AM; Schreuder WO; Bulder ER; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM
Intensive Care Med; 1996 Oct; 22(10):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8923081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
