207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21318935)
1. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast MRI: opportunities and challenges.
Day D
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):45-8. PubMed ID: 20092173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 20657229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential of MR mammography to predict tumor grading of invasive breast cancer.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 21442559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography?
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Beger S; Freiberg C; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19862654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer--a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines].
Hausmann D; Kern C; Schröder MT; Sütterlin M; Schönberg SO; Neff KW; Dinter DJ
Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22068844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Tan LK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):901-10. PubMed ID: 12646427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Bolivar AV; Gomez SS; Merino P; Alonso-Bartolomé P; Garcia EO; Cacho PM; Hoffmeister JW
Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1086-92. PubMed ID: 20883182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens.
Kuzmiak CM; Millnamow GA; Qaqish B; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Brown ME
Acad Radiol; 2002 Dec; 9(12):1378-82. PubMed ID: 12553348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening.
Bick U; Engelken F; Diederichs G; Dzyuballa R; Ortmann M; Fallenberg EM
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):849-56. PubMed ID: 23740312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Mariscotti G; Houssami N; Durando M; Bergamasco L; Campanino PP; Ruggieri C; Regini E; Luparia A; Bussone R; Sapino A; Fonio P; Gandini G
Anticancer Res; 2014 Mar; 34(3):1219-25. PubMed ID: 24596363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: early experience.
Morris EA; Schwartz LH; Drotman MB; Kim SJ; Tan LK; Liberman L; Abramson AF; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 10644103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
