144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21319880)
1. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrity tests predict counterproductive work behaviors and job performance well: comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012).
Ones DS; Viswesvaran C; Schmidt FL
J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 22582728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test publishers' perspective on "an updated meta-analysis": comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012).
Harris WG; Jones JW; Klion R; Arnold DW; Camara W; Cunningham MR
J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 22582727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The critical role of the research question, inclusion criteria, and transparency in meta-analyses of integrity test research: a reply to Harris et al. (2012) and Ones, Viswesvaran, and Schmidt (2012).
Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):543-9; discussion 531-6, 537-42. PubMed ID: 22582729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover.
Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Putka DJ; Lanivich SE
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1167-94. PubMed ID: 21744941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On reconciling conflicting meta-analytic findings regarding integrity test validity.
Sackett PR; Schmitt N
J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22582730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past.
Hough LM; Oswald FL
Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():631-64. PubMed ID: 10751983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incremental validity of person-organization fit over the Big Five personality measures.
Tsai WC; Chen HY; Chen CC
J Psychol; 2012; 146(5):485-509. PubMed ID: 22931006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using individual differences to predict job performance: correcting for direct and indirect restriction of range.
Sjöberg S; Sjöberg A; Näswall K; Sverke M
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 22612634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: an assessment of its criterion-related validity.
Arthur W; Bell ST; Villado AJ; Doverspike D
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(4):786-801. PubMed ID: 16834506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance.
McCarthy JM; Van Iddekinge CH; Lievens F; Kung MC; Sinar EF; Campion MA
J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):701-19. PubMed ID: 23937298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can I retake it? Exploring subgroup differences and criterion-related validity in promotion retesting.
Van Iddekinge CH; Morgeson FP; Schleicher DJ; Campion MA
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 21517142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.
Hoffman CC; Morris D; Luck G
Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):900-16. PubMed ID: 20099553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Great Eight competencies: a criterion-centric approach to validation.
Bartram D
J Appl Psychol; 2005 Nov; 90(6):1185-203. PubMed ID: 16316273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An openness scale for the California Psychological Inventory.
Hakstian AR; Farrell S
J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):107-34. PubMed ID: 11206293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: a qualitative and quantitative review.
Berry CM; Clark MA; McClure TK
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):881-906. PubMed ID: 21443313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A counterintuitive hypothesis about employment interview validity and some supporting evidence.
Schmidt FL; Zimmerman RD
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):553-61. PubMed ID: 15161412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
