These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21319880)

  • 1. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrity tests predict counterproductive work behaviors and job performance well: comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012).
    Ones DS; Viswesvaran C; Schmidt FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 22582728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test publishers' perspective on "an updated meta-analysis": comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012).
    Harris WG; Jones JW; Klion R; Arnold DW; Camara W; Cunningham MR
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 22582727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The critical role of the research question, inclusion criteria, and transparency in meta-analyses of integrity test research: a reply to Harris et al. (2012) and Ones, Viswesvaran, and Schmidt (2012).
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):543-9; discussion 531-6, 537-42. PubMed ID: 22582729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Putka DJ; Lanivich SE
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1167-94. PubMed ID: 21744941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On reconciling conflicting meta-analytic findings regarding integrity test validity.
    Sackett PR; Schmitt N
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22582730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past.
    Hough LM; Oswald FL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():631-64. PubMed ID: 10751983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incremental validity of person-organization fit over the Big Five personality measures.
    Tsai WC; Chen HY; Chen CC
    J Psychol; 2012; 146(5):485-509. PubMed ID: 22931006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using individual differences to predict job performance: correcting for direct and indirect restriction of range.
    Sjöberg S; Sjöberg A; Näswall K; Sverke M
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 22612634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: an assessment of its criterion-related validity.
    Arthur W; Bell ST; Villado AJ; Doverspike D
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(4):786-801. PubMed ID: 16834506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance.
    McCarthy JM; Van Iddekinge CH; Lievens F; Kung MC; Sinar EF; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):701-19. PubMed ID: 23937298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can I retake it? Exploring subgroup differences and criterion-related validity in promotion retesting.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Morgeson FP; Schleicher DJ; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 21517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.
    Hoffman CC; Morris D; Luck G
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):900-16. PubMed ID: 20099553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Great Eight competencies: a criterion-centric approach to validation.
    Bartram D
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Nov; 90(6):1185-203. PubMed ID: 16316273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An openness scale for the California Psychological Inventory.
    Hakstian AR; Farrell S
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):107-34. PubMed ID: 11206293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: a qualitative and quantitative review.
    Berry CM; Clark MA; McClure TK
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):881-906. PubMed ID: 21443313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A counterintuitive hypothesis about employment interview validity and some supporting evidence.
    Schmidt FL; Zimmerman RD
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):553-61. PubMed ID: 15161412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.