BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21320564)

  • 1. Bioinformatics and the allergy assessment of agricultural biotechnology products: industry practices and recommendations.
    Ladics GS; Cressman RF; Herouet-Guicheney C; Herman RA; Privalle L; Song P; Ward JM; McClain S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Jun; 60(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21320564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of possible allergenicity of hypothetical ORFs in common food crops using current bioinformatic guidelines and its implications for the safety assessment of GM crops.
    Young GJ; Zhang S; Mirsky HP; Cressman RF; Cong B; Ladics GS; Zhong CX
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 50(10):3741-51. PubMed ID: 22867756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of short amino acid sequence matches for prediction of protein allergenicity.
    Silvanovich A; Nemeth MA; Song P; Herman R; Tagliani L; Bannon GA
    Toxicol Sci; 2006 Mar; 90(1):252-8. PubMed ID: 16338955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of the development of methodology for evaluating the human allergenic potential of novel proteins.
    Taylor SL
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2006 Jul; 50(7):604-9. PubMed ID: 16736463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical criteria for performance characteristics of IgE binding methods for evaluating safety of biotech food products.
    Holzhauser T; Ree Rv; Poulsen LK; Bannon GA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S15-9. PubMed ID: 18727951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology.
    Delaney B; Astwood JD; Cunny H; Conn RE; Herouet-Guicheney C; Macintosh S; Meyer LS; Privalle L; Gao Y; Mattsson J; Levine M;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46 Suppl 2():S71-97. PubMed ID: 18348900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performing IgE serum testing due to bioinformatics matches in the allergenicity assessment of GM crops.
    Goodman RE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S24-34. PubMed ID: 18715545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review.
    Goodman RE; Hefle SL; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2005 Jun; 137(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 15947471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational allergenicity prediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops.
    Verma AK; Misra A; Subash S; Das M; Dwivedi PD
    Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2011 Sep; 33(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 20964517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural relatedness of plant food allergens with specific reference to cross-reactive allergens: an in silico analysis.
    Jenkins JA; Griffiths-Jones S; Shewry PR; Breiteneder H; Mills EN
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Jan; 115(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 15637564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioinformatic analysis for allergenicity assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins expressed in insect-resistant food crops.
    Randhawa GJ; Singh M; Grover M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2011 Feb; 49(2):356-62. PubMed ID: 21078358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of putative and potential cross-reactive chickpea (Cicer arietinum) allergens through an in silico approach.
    Kulkarni A; Ananthanarayan L; Raman K
    Comput Biol Chem; 2013 Dec; 47():149-55. PubMed ID: 24099701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of cross-reactivity between the Bacillus thuringiensis derived protein Cry1F in maize grain and dust mite Der p7 protein with human sera positive for Der p7-IgE.
    Ladics GS; Bardina L; Cressman RF; Mattsson JL; Sampson HA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 16406630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety.
    Panda R; Ariyarathna H; Amnuaycheewa P; Tetteh A; Pramod SN; Taylor SL; Ballmer-Weber BK; Goodman RE
    Allergy; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 23205714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific advancement of novel protein allergenicity evaluation: an overview of work from the HESI Protein Allergenicity Technical Committee (2000-2008).
    Thomas K; MacIntosh S; Bannon G; Herouet-Guicheney C; Holsapple M; Ladics G; McClain S; Vieths S; Woolhiser M; Privalle L
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 47(6):1041-50. PubMed ID: 19425225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.