BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21320564)

  • 41. Bioinformatic methods for allergenicity assessment using a comprehensive allergen database.
    Hileman RE; Silvanovich A; Goodman RE; Rice EA; Holleschak G; Astwood JD; Hefle SL
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2002 Aug; 128(4):280-91. PubMed ID: 12218366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. AllergenOnline: A peer-reviewed, curated allergen database to assess novel food proteins for potential cross-reactivity.
    Goodman RE; Ebisawa M; Ferreira F; Sampson HA; van Ree R; Vieths S; Baumert JL; Bohle B; Lalithambika S; Wise J; Taylor SL
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2016 May; 60(5):1183-98. PubMed ID: 26887584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Genetically modified food (food derived from biotechnology): current and future trends in public acceptance and safety assessment].
    Nishiura H; Imai H; Nakao H; Tsukino H; Kuroda Y; Katoh T
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1135-41. PubMed ID: 12508467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Benefits and concerns associated with biotechnology-derived foods: can additional research reduce children health risks?
    Cantani A
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2009; 13(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 19364084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Food biotechnology: is this good or bad? Implications to allergic diseases.
    Helm RM
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2003 Jun; 90(6 Suppl 3):90-8. PubMed ID: 12839121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [The allergic risk of transgenic foods strategy for prevention].
    Moneret-Vautrin DA
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2003 Mar; 61(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 12668947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.
    Varzakas TH; Chryssochoidis G; Argyropoulos D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 17275157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Structural insight into protein T1, the non-allergenic member of the Bet v 1 allergen family-An in silico analysis.
    Ghosh D; Gupta-Bhattacharya S
    Mol Immunol; 2008 Jan; 45(2):456-62. PubMed ID: 17658604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Protein allergenicity assessment of foods produced through agricultural biotechnology.
    Taylor SL
    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 2002; 42():99-112. PubMed ID: 11807166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of allergic potential of (novel) foods.
    Wal JM
    Nahrung; 1999 Jun; 43(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 10399350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Differences in allergenic potential of food extracts following oral exposure in mice reflect differences in digestibility: potential approaches to safety assessment.
    Bowman CC; Selgrade MK
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Mar; 102(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 18033772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Allergy assessment of foods or ingredients derived from biotechnology, gene-modified organisms, or novel foods.
    Poulsen LK
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2004 Nov; 48(6):413-23. PubMed ID: 15508176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Nutritional and safety assessment of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology--case studies by the International Food Biotechnology Committee of ILSI.
    Glenn KC
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():229-32. PubMed ID: 18296343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evolutionary distance from human homologs reflects allergenicity of animal food proteins.
    Jenkins JA; Breiteneder H; Mills EN
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Dec; 120(6):1399-405. PubMed ID: 17935767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Further evaluation of the utility of "sliding window" FASTA in predicting cross-reactivity with allergenic proteins.
    Cressman RF; Ladics G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S20-5. PubMed ID: 19114081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
    Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods.
    Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Agricultural biotechnology safety assessment].
    McClain S; Jones W; He X; Ladics G; Bartholomaeus A; Raybould A; Lutter P; Xu H; Wang X
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 49(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 25876504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of global sequence comparison and one-to-one FASTA local alignment in regulatory allergenicity assessment of transgenic proteins in food crops.
    Song P; Herman RA; Kumpatla S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 71():142-8. PubMed ID: 24953553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Allergen cross-reactivity in allergic rhinitis and oral-allergy syndrome: a bioinformatic protein sequence analysis.
    Platt M; Howell S; Sachdeva R; Dumont C
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Jul; 4(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 24799331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.